Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36246149›Full record

ArticleJournal of human rights practice2022

'Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act' of India: An Analysis of Substantive Access to Rights of a Transgender Community.

Shamayeta Bhattacharya, Debarchana Ghosh, Bandana Purkayastha

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human rights practice, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
10.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shamayeta BhattacharyaShamayeta Bhattacharya (First Author) is a PhD candidate in Geography, at the University of Connecticut, USA. Her research interest includes health and gender geography, human rights, postcolonial queer literature, and South Asia.
Bandana PurkayasthaBandana Purkayastha (Third Author) is Professor of Sociology and Asian & Asian American Studies, University of Connecticut, USA. She has published extensively on human rights, intersectionality, transnationalism, migrants, violence, and peace.
University of Connecticut · US

Funding

Connecting People, Places, and Barriers: The Effect of These Connections on AdheK01DA037794 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI GHOSH, DEBARCHANA · 2014 to 2018
$863k
NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA037794
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The amendments to the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act of India in 2019 address non-binary persons' constitutional rights, recognition of their gender identity, and non-discrimination laws across institutional spaces (for example, family, workplace, education, and healthcare). The Act discusses legal rights in isolation of praxis, structural support and, more importantly, lacks guidelines needed to substantively access rights. Such a disconnection relegates human rights to merely legal changes with limited practice. In this article, we discuss the achievements and failures of the act from the perspective of a transgender community in India, and the impact it has had on their lives from its formulation in 2014. Although non-binary communities are recognized, they face severe abuse and discrimination. We analyse accounts of 15 transgender persons' lived experiences and challenges they faced in claiming their rights in Kolkata, a metropolis in eastern India. We used the framework of substantive access to rights, that is, the actual ability to practice and access documented rights, to critically discuss our findings across family, work, education, and healthcare spaces, often showing the gaps between achieved legal status, and the practical realities on the ground. We provide several recommendations to bridge these gaps-improving educational equity for non-binary people, including transgender specific training for healthcare providers and, more importantly, increasing the adequate representation of non-binary people in the positions of negotiation. The road to claiming social and economic rights following legal rights for non-binary gender communities cannot be achieved without overcoming their erasure within families and hypervisibility in public spaces.

Indexed as

community perspectivediscriminationintersectionalitylegal rightsnon-binary gender identitypublic spaces

Identifiers

PMID36246149
PMCPMC9555747
OpenAlexW4211069278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.