Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36246077›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2022

Patient-reported Outcomes of Scar Impact: Comparing of Abdominoplasty, Breast Surgery, and Facial Surgery Patients.

Stuti P Garg, Joshua P Weissman, Narainsai K Reddy, Jeffrey Varghese, Marco F Ellis, John Y S Kim, Robert D Galiano

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Scar Healing after Breast Reconstruction: A 5-year Follow-up in Asian Patients.Journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Early Patient-Reported Outcomes as Predictors of Long-Term Scar Satisfaction: An Exploratory Cohort Study.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stuti P GargDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill.
Joshua P WeissmanDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill.
Narainsai K ReddyDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Texas A&M Health Science Center College of Medicine, Engineering Medicine (EnMed), Houston, Tex.
Jeffrey VargheseDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill.
Marco F EllisDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill.
John Y S KimDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill.
Robert D GalianoDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill.
Northwestern University · USTexas A&M Health Science Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scarring negatively impacts patient mental health, causing worsened self-confidence, body image, and social interactions, as well as anxiety and depression. The objective of this study is to evaluate the scarring impact after facial surgery, breast surgery, and full abdominoplasty for symptoms, appearance, psychosocial health, career, and sexual well-being using validated patient-reported outcome measures. Method: A total of 901 patients from five providers completed the SCAR-Q (covering symptoms, appearance, and psychosocial) and Career/Sexual Well-being assessments via phone or email where a higher score indicated a more positive scar perception. Results: Of the 901 patients, 38.1% had abdominoplasty surgery, 38.1% breast reduction, 15.3% facial surgery, 4.7% breast lift, and 3.9% breast augmentation. The differences in SCAR-Q, appearance, and symptom scores between the five procedures were statistically significant. Breast augmentation SCAR-Q scores (median = 256) and facial surgery (median = 242) were significantly higher than those of abdominoplasty patients (median = 219; Conclusions: This study is the first to show that breast augmentation and facial surgery patients have a more positive perception of their scars in terms of appearance, symptoms, psychosocial, career, and sexual well-being impact than abdominoplasty patients. Furthermore, the data suggest that symptoms may improve over time for abdominoplasty, breast augmentation, and facial surgery patients. This study highlights the need for further follow-up, counseling, or other improvements to postoperative scar care.

Identifiers

PMID36246077
PMCPMC9555912
OpenAlexW4304692355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.