ArticleJournal of oncology2022
NXPH4 Used as a New Prognostic and Immunotherapeutic Marker for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.
Article in Journal of oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- High expression of NXPH4 correlates with poor prognosis, metabolic reprogramming, and immune infiltration in colon adenocarcinoma.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Article
- Article
- Forkhead box protein K1‑regulated neurexophilin 4 promotes proliferation, metastasis and glycolysis in colorectal cancer.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2023Article
- An m6A-Driven Prognostic Marker Panel for Renal Cell Carcinoma Based on the First Transcriptome-Wide m6A-seq.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: One of the most common malignant tumors of the urinary system is muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). With the increased use of immunotherapy, its importance in the field of cancer is becoming abundantly evident. This study classifies MIBC according to GSVA score from the perspective of the GSEA immune gene set. Methods: This study integrated the sequencing and clinical data of MIBC patients in TCGA and GEO databases, then scored the data using the GSVA algorithm, the CNMF algorithm was implemented to divide the subtypes of GEO and TCGA datasets, respectively, and finally screened and determined the key pathways in combination with clinical data. Simultaneously, LASSO Cox regression model was constructed based on key pathway genes to assess the model's predictive ability (ROC) and describe the immune landscape differences between high- and low-risk groups; key genes were further analyzed and verified in patient tissues. Results: 404 TCGA and 297 GEO datasets were divided into C1-3 groups (TCGA-C1:120/C2:152/C3:132; GEO- C1:112/C2:101/C3:84), of which TCGA-C2 ( Conclusion: The immune gene score of MIBC data in TCGA and GEO databases was successfully evaluated using GSVA in this research. The lasso Cox expression model was successfully constructed by screening immune genes, the high-risk group had a worse prognosis and higher sensitivity to immunotherapy, PD-1 inhibitors or PD-1 combined with CTLA-4 inhibitors can be preferentially used in high-risk patients who are sensitive to immunotherapy, and NXPH4 may be a molecular target to adjust the effect of immunotherapy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.