ArticleWetlands (Wilmington, N.C.)2022
Classifying and Mapping Cultural Ecosystem Services Using Artificial Intelligence and Social Media Data.
Article in Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quantifying and mapping cultural ecosystem services are complex because of their intangibility. Data from social media, such as geo-tagged photographs, has been proposed for mapping cultural use or appreciation of ecosystems. However, manual content analysis and classification of large numbers of photographs is time-consuming. The potential of deep learning for automating the analysis of crowdsourced social media content is still being explored in CES research. Here, we use a new deep learning model for automating the classification of natural and human elements relevant to CES from Flickr images. This approach applies a convolutional neural network architecture to analyze over 29,000 photographs from the Lithuanian coast and uses hierarchical clustering to group these photographs. The accuracy of the classification was assessed by comparison with manual classification. Over 37% of the photographs were taken for the landscape appreciation class, and 28% of the photographs were taken of nature, of animals or plants, which represent the nature appreciation class. The main clusters were identified in urban areas, more precisely in the main coastal cities of Lithuania. The distribution of the nature photographs was concentrated around particular natural attractions, and they were more likely to occur in parks and natural reserves with high levels of vegetation and animal cover. This approach that was developed for clustering the photographs was accurate and saved approximately 100 km of manual work. The method demonstrates how analyzing large numbers of digital photographs expands the analytical toolbox available to researchers and allows the quantification and mapping of CES at large geographical scales. Automated assessment and mapping of cultural ecosystem services could be used to inform urban planning and improve nature reserve management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.