Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36245897›Full record

ArticleEcohydrology : ecosystems, land and water process interactions, ecohydrogeomorphology2022

The minnow

Susanne Reier, Luise Kruckenhauser, Aleš Snoj, Peter Trontelj, Anja Palandačić

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecohydrology : ecosystems, land and water process interactions, ecohydrogeomorphology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The minnowEcohydrology : ecosystems, land and water process interactions, ecohydrogeomorphology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Susanne ReierFirst Zoological Department Natural History Museum Vienna Vienna Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6839-7137
Luise KruckenhauserDepartment of Evolutionary Biology University of Vienna Vienna Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8708-4347
Aleš SnojDepartment of Animal Science, Biotechnical Faculty University of Ljubljana Domžale Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4708-0370
Peter TronteljDepartment of Biology, Biotechnical Faculty University of Ljubljana Ljubljana Slovenia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4057-6912
Anja PalandačićFirst Zoological Department Natural History Museum Vienna Vienna Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4555-5240
Natural History Museum Vienna · ATUniversity of Ljubljana · SI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Karst landscapes are characterized by intermittent and sinking streams. The most common method used to study underground hydrological connections in karst is tracing tests. However, a more biologically oriented approach has been suggested: analysis of the genetic structure of aquatic organisms. Biological tracers can be sought among trogloxenes, that is, surface species that occasionally enter caves and groundwater. One such example is the fish genus

Indexed as

Dinaric KarstpaleohydrologyPhoxinusunderground connectionsunderground migration

Identifiers

PMID36245897
PMCPMC9539529
OpenAlexW4283759629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.