Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36245862›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2022

The relationship between daily positive future thinking and past-week suicidal ideation in youth: An experience sampling study.

Olivia J Kirtley, Ginette Lafit, Thomas Vaessen, Jeroen Decoster, Catherine Derom, Sinan Gülöksüz, Marc De Hert, Nele Jacobs, Claudia Menne-Lothmann, Bart P F Rutten and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Olivia J KirtleyDepartment of Neurosciences, Center for Contextual Psychiatry, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Ginette LafitDepartment of Neurosciences, Center for Contextual Psychiatry, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Thomas VaessenDepartment of Neurosciences, Center for Contextual Psychiatry, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Jeroen DecosterPsychiatric Care Sint-Kamillus, Bierbeek, Belgium.
Catherine DeromDepartment of Human Genetics, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Sinan GülöksüzDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Marc De HertLeuven Brain Institute, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Nele JacobsDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, South Limburg Mental Health and Teaching Network, EURON, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Claudia Menne-LothmannDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, South Limburg Mental Health and Teaching Network, EURON, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Bart P F RuttenDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Evert ThieryDepartment of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Jim van OsDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, South Limburg Mental Health and Teaching Network, EURON, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Ruud van WinkelUniversity Psychiatric Centre, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Kortenberg, Belgium.
Marieke WichersInterdisciplinary Center Psychopathology and Emotion Regulation, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Inez Myin-GermeysDepartment of Neurosciences, Center for Contextual Psychiatry, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reduced positive future thinking has been associated with suicidal ideation and behavior in adults, and appears to be exacerbated by negative affect. Yet, this has received little attention in youth. Prior research has also focused on longer-term future thinking, e.g., months and years, and relied on lab-based assessments. Using the experience sampling method (ESM), we investigated whether short-term future thinking in daily life was associated with suicidal ideation in youth and explored the role of affect in the future thinking-suicidal ideation relationship. A community sample of

Indexed as

experience sampling methodfuture thinkinggeneral populationsuicidal ideationyouth

Identifiers

PMID36245862
PMCPMC9556869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.