Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36245837›Full record

ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2022

A Classification Method for Thoracolumbar Vertebral Fractures due to Basketball Sports Injury Based on Deep Learning.

XiaoGan Chen, Yu Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

XiaoGan ChenWuxi Taihu University, Wuxi Jiangsu 214000, China.
Yu LiuWuxi 9th People's Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, Wuxi Jiangsu 214000, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1050-6334

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: There are more and more basketball competitions, to propose a classification method of thoracolumbar fractures to assist in the diagnosis of basketball injuries, to analyze the feasibility of its clinical application, and to improve the recovery rate. Methods: From February 2015 to May 2022, 1130 CT images of thoracolumbar fractures admitted to our hospital and affiliated hospital units due to basketball injuries were collected, and the image labeling system uniformly labeled them. All CT images were classified according to the AO spine classification of thoracolumbar injuries. In the ABC-type classification, 935 CT images were used for training and validation to optimize the deep learning system, including 815 training sets and 120 validation sets; the remaining 198 CT images were used as test sets for comparing the deep learning system and clinician's diagnosis. In the classification of subtype A, a total of 523 CT scans can be performed for training and validation to optimize the deep learning system, including 500 training sets and 23 validation sets; the remaining 94 CT images are used as test sets for comparing depth learning systems and clinicians' diagnostic results. Results: The deep learning system had a correct rate of ABC classification of fractures in 86.4%, with a kappa coefficient of 0.850 ( Conclusion: The classification accuracy of thoracolumbar fractures based on deep learning is high. The method can assist in diagnosing CT images of thoracolumbar fractures and improve the current manual and complex diagnosis process.

Indexed as

Athletic InjuriesBasketballDeep LearningFractures, BoneSpinal FracturesHumansLumbar VertebraeThoracic Vertebrae

Identifiers

PMID36245837
PMCPMC9556197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.