ArticleOncology letters2022
Lymph node response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy as an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer.
Article in Oncology letters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- A LODDS and PNI-based personalized prognostic model for patients with gastric cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Prognostic significance of a pathological response in metastatic lymph nodes of patients with gastric cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery.Surgery today · 2024Article
- PREOPERATIVE CHEMOTHERAPY VERSUS UPFRONT SURGERY FOR ADVANCED GASTRIC CANCER: A PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHING ANALYSIS.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2023Article
- Article
- The crosstalk between the gut microbiota and tumor immunity: Implications for cancer progression and treatment outcomes.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Previous studies have revealed the usefulness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by surgery for clinical stage III gastric cancer (GC). The tumor volume at the primary tumor site (PT) is sometimes difficult to measure because of the luminal structure; therefore, evaluation of the lymph node (LN) response to NAC may help to more accurately predict survival outcomes. The present study therefore evaluated the LN response to NAC for prediction of survival outcomes in patients with GC. The study involved 160 patients with clinical stage III GC who underwent NAC (n=14) and upfront surgery (n=146). PT and LN responses to NAC were evaluated, various clinicopathological factors were evaluated and Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were performed to determine survival outcomes. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were not significantly different between patients who underwent NAC and those who underwent upfront surgery (OS, P=0.71; DFS, P=0.50). However, although there were no significant differences in PT responses, patients classified as LN non-responders to NAC had a significantly worse prognosis compared with patients classified as LN responders in terms of DFS (PT, P=0.93; LN, P<0.01) and OS (PT, P=0.84; LN, P<0.01). Moreover, a higher neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio tended to be associated with poor DFS [univariate: hazard ratio (HR)=4.23, P=0.06; multivariate: HR=6.45, P=0.04]. Finally, an LN response to NAC was significantly better for prediction of recurrence (univariate, HR=7.79, 95% confidence interval=1.16-63.51, P=0.02; multivariate, HR=7.44, P=0.01). Overall, the current study revealed the clinical importance of the LN response to NAC for predicting survival outcomes in patients with GC. These findings highlight the potential clinical impact of optimizing treatment strategies to improve the selection and management of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.