Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36245672›Full record

ArticleZoologica scripta2022

Neogastropod (Mollusca, Gastropoda) phylogeny: A step forward with mitogenomes.

Thomas Lemarcis, Alexander E Fedosov, Yuri I Kantor, Jawad Abdelkrim, Paul Zaharias, Nicolas Puillandre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zoologica scripta, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Thomas LemarcisInstitut Systématique Evolution Biodiversité (ISYEB), Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, CNRS, EPHE Sorbonne Université, Université des Antilles Paris France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7099-1984
Alexander E FedosovInstitut Systématique Evolution Biodiversité (ISYEB), Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, CNRS, EPHE Sorbonne Université, Université des Antilles Paris France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8035-1403
Yuri I KantorInstitut Systématique Evolution Biodiversité (ISYEB), Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, CNRS, EPHE Sorbonne Université, Université des Antilles Paris France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3209-4940
Jawad AbdelkrimUAR 2700 'Acquisition et Analyse de Données pour l'Histoire naturelle', Service d'Analyse de Données, CNRS Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Sorbonne Universités Paris Cedex France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7996-8660
Paul ZahariasInstitut Systématique Evolution Biodiversité (ISYEB), Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, CNRS, EPHE Sorbonne Université, Université des Antilles Paris France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3550-2636
Nicolas PuillandreInstitut Systématique Evolution Biodiversité (ISYEB), Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, CNRS, EPHE Sorbonne Université, Université des Antilles Paris France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9797-0892

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Neogastropoda (Mollusca, Gastropoda) encompass more than 15,000 described species of marine predators, including several model organisms in toxinology, embryology and physiology. However, their phylogenetic relationships remain mostly unresolved and their classification unstable. We took advantage of the many mitogenomes published in GenBank to produce a new molecular phylogeny of the neogastropods. We completed the taxon sampling by using an in-house bioinformatic pipeline to retrieve mitochondrial genes from 13 transcriptomes, corresponding to five families not represented in GenBank, for a final dataset of 113 taxa. Because mitogenomic data are prone to reconstruction artefacts, eight different evolutionary models were applied to reconstruct phylogenetic trees with IQTREE, RAxML and MrBayes. If the over-parametrization of some models produced trees with aberrant internal long branches, the global topology of the trees remained stable over models and softwares, and several relationships were revealed or found supported here for the first time. However, even if our dataset encompasses 60% of the valid families of neogastropods, some key taxa are missing and should be added in the future before proposing a revision of the classification of the neogastropods. Our study also demonstrates that even complex models struggle to satisfactorily handle the evolutionary history of mitogenomes, still leading to long-branch attractions in phylogenetic trees. Other approaches, such as reduced-genome strategies, must be envisaged to fully resolve the neogastropod phylogeny.

Indexed as

mitogenomesNeogastropodaphylogenysystematics

Identifiers

PMID36245672
PMCPMC9544082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.