ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2022
Mediastinal lymph node evaluation, especially at station 4L, in left upper lobe lung cancer.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06496360 (Prediction Model of Mediastinal Group IV Lymph Node Metastasis in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Based on CT Radiomics), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prediction Model of Mediastinal Group IV Lymph Node Metastasis in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Based on CT Radiomics
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Etiology, Evaluation and Comprehensive Management of Hoarseness after Lung Cancer Surgery].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2026Review
- Computed tomography-based radiomics model for predicting station 4 lymph node metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Export priority technique for Uni-portal thoracoscopic left upper lobectomy.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2024Article
- Surgical evaluation of station 4L in patients with lung cancer: the Ugly Duckling.Journal of thoracic disease · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mediastinal lymph node (LN) dissection during lung resection is essential for accurate staging. Station 4L dissection is anatomically difficult. Therefore, care should be taken to avoid complications. We investigated the importance of mediastinal LN dissection in left upper lobe lung cancer and evaluated intraoperative videos to identify relevant steps during dissection. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 151 consecutive patients with left upper lobe lung cancer. Finally, 139 patients were enrolled to examine the survival effects of clinical factors of metastatic LN stations. The association between risk factors or surgical procedures and recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy was analyzed. Results: LN dissection of the left upper lobe revealed station 4L LN metastasis in nine patients, three of whom were node-negative on mediastinoscopy. Station 4L LN status was confirmed intraoperatively in 12 of 33 patients. Twenty patients had recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy, four of whom were complicated with aspiration pneumonia. Station 4L LN dissection was an independent risk factor for recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy (P=0.03). The use of an energy device near the recurrent laryngeal nerve was a significant risk factor for recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy. Incidentally, pathological N stage ≥2 was an independent prognostic factor for disease-free survival (DFS) (P=0.005) herein. Conclusions: In patients with left upper lobe lung cancer, pathological N2 disease is an important predictor of recurrence. Therefore, accurate mediastinal LN dissection, including at station 4L, should be performed. We propose to standardize the dissection procedure at each institution to avoid complications, such as recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.