ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2022
Causes and management of intraoperative complications in robot-assisted anatomical pulmonary resection for lung cancer.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Robotic Bronchial Restapling After Inadvertent Stapling of an Endobronchial Suction Tube: Technical Note and a Prestapling Time-Out.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Prevention and management of pulmonary vascular complications in anatomic lung resections: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Reduced incidence of significant vessel injury in robotic-assisted thoracic surgery compared with video-assisted thoracic surgery.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Intraoperative Repair of Bronchial Damage Following Robotic Segmentectomy.Thoracic cancer · 2025Article
- Comparison of clinical efficacy of da Vinci robot-assisted lung cancer surgery with two-, three- and four-hole approaches.Updates in surgery · 2024Article
- Suctionable Gauze Ball Operated by the Console Surgeon Overcomes Wet Scenes during Robotic Rectal Surgery.Journal of the anus, rectum and colon · 2024Article
- Outcomes of robotic lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer in a National Cancer Institute-Comprehensive Cancer CenterJournal of thoracic disease · 2023Article
- Adopting the robotic platform for anatomic lung resections: real life lessons for the tech enthusiast.Journal of thoracic disease · 2023Article
- Profiles of intraoperative complications in robot-assisted anatomical pulmonary resection for lung cancer.Journal of thoracic disease · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To perform safe robot-assisted anatomical lung resections, the details of intraoperative complications need to be shared among thoracic surgeons. However, only limited data are available. Methods: This retrospective, single-institutional study evaluated 134 patients who underwent robot-assisted anatomical lung resection. We examined the causes, management, and outcomes of all intraoperative complications. Results: Of the 134 eligible patients, 118 (88%) underwent lobectomy and 16 (12%) underwent segmentectomy. Intraoperative complications occurred in 17 (12.7%) patients. These complications included pulmonary artery (PA) injuries in seven patients, pulmonary vein (PV) injuries in three, azygos vein (AV) injury in one, superior vena cava (SVC) injury in one, bronchial injuries in three, and lung injuries in four. Most PA injuries were at a distal side and controlled by pressure, fibrin sealant, or stapling of the proximal side. In the three PV injuries, right upper PV was sandwiched by robotic instruments, V6 was punctured by the tip of the Maryland bipolar forceps, and the distal side of V2t was injured during tunneling of a minor interlobar fissure. These were controlled the same way as the PA injuries. The AV injury occurred during hilar lymph node (LN) dissection and was controlled by suturing. The SVC injury was caused by interference of the robotic forceps and the suction tube outside the field of view during upper mediastinal LN dissection. The injury was controlled by continuous pressure while layering polyglycolic acid sheets and fibrin glue. In the three bronchial injuries, B10 was injured during subcarinal LN dissection, right main bronchus was injured during upper bronchus dissection and the stapling failure of the bronchus occurred by strong traction. They were all repaired by suturing. All lung parenchymal injuries were caused by manipulation of robotic instruments outside the field of view. The lung injuries were repaired by suturing with pledgets. No cases were converted to thoracotomy. The 30-day mortality rate was 0.7%. The cause of mortality was pneumonia. Conclusions: In robot-assisted anatomical pulmonary resection for lung cancer, most major intraoperative complications can be safely managed robotically without conversion to thoracotomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.