Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36245474›Full record

ArticleACS catalysis2021

Electric Fields in Catalysis: From Enzymes to Molecular Catalysts.

Nadia G Léonard, Rakia Dhaoui, Teera Chantarojsiri, Jenny Y Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS catalysis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Photoisomerization detected in a fully wavelength-tunable rhodopsin mimic system.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Organocatalytic Microfluidic Double-Layer Capacitors.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Alkali metal cations enhance COPhilosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nadia G LéonardDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, California 92697, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0949-5471
Rakia DhaouiDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, California 92697, United States.
Teera ChantarojsiriDepartment of Chemistry and Center of Excellence for Innovation in Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-4951-9503
Jenny Y YangDepartment of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, California 92697, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9680-8260

Funding

Redox enzymes - tuning and designR01GM134047 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ALEXANDROVA, ANASTASSIA N, YANG, JENNY · 2019 to 2022
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM134047
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electric fields underlie all reactions and impact reactivity by interacting with the dipoles and net charges of transition states, products, and reactants to modify the free energy landscape. However, they are rarely given deliberate consideration in synthetic design to rationally control reactivity. This Perspective discusses the commonalities of electric field effects across multiple platforms, from enzymes to molecular catalysts, and identifies practical challenges to applying them in synthetic molecular systems to mediate reactivity.

Indexed as

bioinorganiccatalysisdipoleselectric fieldselectrostaticsredox reactionstransition metals

Identifiers

PMID36245474
PMCPMC9560040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.