Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36245318›Full record

ArticleHealth & social care in the community2022

Trajectories to a cancer diagnosis: Why and when women seek help for breast symptoms in Vietnam.

Trang Do, Andrea Whittaker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health & social care in the community, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Trang DoSchool of Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1524-6711
Andrea WhittakerCo-Convener of Health and Biofutures Focus Programme, School of Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2616-9651

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Women in low- and middle-income countries where the prevalence and mortality of breast cancer are growing rapidly are more likely to be diagnosed at advanced stages, which negatively affects their treatment outcomes and chance of survival. The current literature in those settings tends to focus largely on explaining patient delay in seeking medical attention for breast symptoms. Meanwhile, little is known as to what prompts women to attend screening and diagnostic services after discovering symptomatic breasts. Drawn upon the data from in-depth interviews with 33 breast cancer patients in Central Vietnam conducted in 2019, this paper examines the context of women's decisions about breast screening and how the practice of seeking cancer diagnosis occurred. Our findings reveal an absence of a national screening program and that seeking medical advice was conducted on an ad hoc basis after self-detection of breast symptoms. Women's interpretations of symptomatic breasts as suspicious signs of cancer, the co-occurrence of important life events, or encouragement by people in their social network motivated women to seek medical attention at different public and private health facilities. Their encounters with the health sector often involved multiple visits across time and space in which they experienced various forms of diagnosis delay produced by the health system. Our study carries implications for interventions to encourage women's awareness of early cancer symptoms and prompt medical presentation after self-discovery of symptomatic breasts.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsPatient Acceptance of Health CareFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansVietnambreast cancercancercancer screeningdiagnosisearly detectionhelp-seekingVietnam

Identifiers

PMID36245318
PMCPMC10092510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.