Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36245228›Full record

ArticleJournal of gynecologic oncology2022

Incidence of gastrointestinal perforation associated with bevacizumab in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy as first-line treatment of advanced ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer: analysis of a Japanese healthcare claims database.

Akihiko Ueda, Hidemichi Watari, Masaki Mandai, Shunichi Fukuhara, Yasuo Sugitani, Kiyoko Ogino, Shuichi Kamijima, Takayuki Enomoto

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Akihiko UedaDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Graduate School of Medicine and Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan. aueda@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0001-8139-9292
Hidemichi WatariDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hokkaido University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4189-6187
Masaki MandaiDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Graduate School of Medicine and Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4428-8029
Shunichi FukuharaSection of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Community Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7199-1495
Yasuo SugitaniBiometrics Department, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-2291-0323
Kiyoko OginoMedical Science Department, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6735-002X
Shuichi KamijimaMedical Science Department, Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1642-4495
Takayuki EnomotoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4538-5541
Kyoto University · JPHokkaido University · JPJohns Hopkins University · USNiigata University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the incidence of bevacizumab-associated gastrointestinal (GI) perforation during first-line treatment of patients with ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in Japanese real-world clinical practice.

methodsA retrospective study was conducted using a healthcare claims database owned by Medical Data Vision Co., Ltd. (study period, 2008-2020). Patients who initiated first-line treatment of ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer were identified and divided into NAC and primary debulking surgery (PDS) groups. The incidence of bevacizumab-associated GI perforation was compared within the NAC group and between the groups.

resultsPaclitaxel + carboplatin (TC) was most commonly used as first-line treatment (39.5% and 59.6% in the NAC and PDS groups, respectively). TC + bevacizumab was used in 9.3% and 11.6% of patients in the NAC and PDS groups, respectively. In the NAC group receiving TC, the proportion of patients with risk factors for GI perforation was lower among patients with versus without concomitant bevacizumab. The incidence of GI perforation in the NAC group was 0.38% (1/266 patients) in patients receiving TC + bevacizumab and 0.18% (2/1,131 patients) in patients receiving TC without bevacizumab (risk ratio=2.13; 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.19 to 23.36; risk difference=0.20; 95% CI=-0.58 to 0.97). None of the 319 patients in the PDS group receiving TC + bevacizumab had GI perforation.

conclusionNo notable increase was observed in GI perforation associated with NAC containing bevacizumab. We conclude that bevacizumab is prescribed with sufficient care in Japan to avoid GI perforation.

Indexed as

Ovarian NeoplasmsPeritoneal NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBevacizumabCarboplatinDelivery of Health CareFallopian TubesFemaleHumansIncidenceJapanNeoadjuvant TherapyPaclitaxelRetrospective StudiesBevacizumabCarboplatinPaclitaxelAdministrative Claims, HealthcareBevacizumabCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialIntestinal PerforationJapanNeoadjuvant Therapy

Identifiers

PMID36245228
PMCPMC9634096
OpenAlexW4306668515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.