Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36245213›Full record

ArticleCerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)2023

Top-down control of the left visual field bias in cued visual spatial attention.

Sreenivasan Meyyappan, Abhijit Rajan, George R Mangun, Mingzhou Ding

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Role of the Medial Posterior Parietal Cortex in Orchestrating Attention and Reaching.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  5. Modulation of reaching by spatial attention.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sreenivasan MeyyappanJ. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7267-5072
Abhijit RajanJ. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3794-3435
George R MangunCenter for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis, CA 95618, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6800-8891
Mingzhou DingJ. Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1024-3503
University of Florida · USUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

Mechanisms of attentional control: Structure and dynamics from simultaneous EEG-fMRI and machine learningR01MH117991 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI DING, MINGZHOU, MANGUN, GEORGE R · 2018 to 2022
$2.7M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH117991
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A left visual field (LVF) bias in perceptual judgments, response speed, and discrimination accuracy has been reported in humans. Cognitive factors, such as visual spatial attention, are known to modulate or even eliminate this bias. We investigated this problem by recording pupillometry together with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in a cued visual spatial attention task. We observed that (i) the pupil was significantly more dilated following attend-right than attend-left cues, (ii) the task performance (e.g. reaction time [RT]) did not differ between attend-left and attend-right trials, and (iii) the difference in cue-related pupil dilation between attend-left and attend-right trials was inversely related to the corresponding difference in RT. Neuroscientically, correlating the difference in cue-related pupil dilation with the corresponding cue-related fMRI difference yielded activations primarily in the right hemisphere, including the right intraparietal sulcus and the right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex. These results suggest that (i) there is an asymmetry in visual spatial attention control, with the rightward attention control being more effortful than the leftward attention control, (ii) this asymmetry underlies the reduction or the elimination of the LVF bias, and (iii) the components of the attentional control networks in the right hemisphere are likely part of the neural substrate of the observed asymmetry in attentional control.

Indexed as

CuesVisual FieldsAttentionBrain MappingFunctional LateralityHumansPhotic StimulationReaction TimeSpace Perceptionattentional cuingleft visual field biaspseudoneglectpupillometryspatial attention

Identifiers

PMID36245213
PMCPMC10151882
OpenAlexW4306385843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.