ArticleCurrent genetics2022
Transcriptional noise adjusted for expression levels reveals genes with high transcriptional noise that are highly expressed, functionally related, and co-regulated in yeast.
Article in Current genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Relationships between gene expression variability, expression levels, and Protein-Protein interactions in mouse and yeast.PloS one · 2026Article
- Roles of P-body factors inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Roles of P-body factors in Candida albicans filamentation and stress response.PLoS genetics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding the relationship between variability in single-cell and non-single-cell gene expression studies will aid in understanding the role of and mechanisms that lead to variability in biological systems. Studies on the variation of gene expression levels in yeast normally focus on single cells and use the coefficient of variance (CV) as a measure of noise. The CV is typically negatively correlated with gene expression levels, so most of the studies using yeast find that genes with high transcriptional noise are lowly expressed. We find adjusting noise for expression levels using linear/natural log polynomial, and local fits and analyzing many non-single-cell RNA-seq sets identifies genes with high median transcriptional noise that are different than those that have high median CVs. Interestingly, these genes are heavily regulated by transcription factors that are related to variability and stochastic processes based on single-cell studies, including Msn2p, Msn4p, Hsf1p, and Crz1p but are not associated with genes with high median CVs based on non-single-cell gene expression data. In addition, adjusting noise for expression levels in a single-cell RNA-seq data set adds value by finding genes that have noisy gene expression levels and their associated transcription factors that are not found to be associated with genes with high CVs in the single-cell expression data or a comparable non-single-cell gene expression data. Lastly, S. cerevisiae genes with noisy expression tend to have orthologs with noisy gene expression in C. albicans, indicating transcriptional noise is evolutionarily conserved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.