Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36244995›Full record

ArticleProgress in orthodontics2022

Midpalatal suture bone repair after miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion in adults.

Rodrigo Naveda, Alexandre Magno Dos Santos, María Pía Seminario, Felicia Miranda, Guilherme Janson, Daniela Garib

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Progress in orthodontics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rodrigo NavedaDepartment of Orthodontics, Bauru Dental School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. rodrigonaveda8@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8114-7650
Alexandre Magno Dos Santos, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
María Pía SeminarioDepartment of Orthodontics, Bauru Dental School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Felicia MirandaDepartment of Orthodontics, Bauru Dental School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Guilherme Janson
Daniela GaribDepartment of Orthodontics, Bauru Dental School, and Hospital for Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMidpalatal suture (MPS) repair in growing patients after RPE has been previously reported. However, differences between young and adult patients for timing and pattern of MPS repair after rapid maxillary expansion are expected. The aim of this study was to evaluate the midpalatal suture repair pattern after miniscrew-assisted rapid palatal expansion (MARPE) in adult patients. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe study included 21 patients (six males, 15 females) successfully treated with MARPE with a mean initial age of 29.1 years of age (SD = 8.0; range = 20.1-45.1). MPS repair was evaluated using maxillary axial and coronal sections derived from CBCT exams taken 16 months after the expansion (SD = 5.9). Objective and subjective assessments of MPS repair were performed. Objective assessments were performed measuring MPS bone density at anterior, median and posterior region of hard palate. Pre-expansion and post-retention bone density changes were evaluated using paired t tests (p < 0.05). Midpalatal suture bone repair was scored 0 to 3 considering, respectively, the complete absence of bone repair in the MPS, the repair of less than 50% of the MPS, the repair of more than 50% of the MPS and the complete repair of the MPS. Intra- and interexaminer reliability evaluation were assessed using Kappa coefficient.

resultsThe objective evaluation showed a significant higher bone density at the pre-expansion stage in all palatal regions. The reliability of the subjective method was adequate with intra- and interexaminer agreements varying from 0.807 to 0.904. Scores 1, 2 and 3 were found in 19.05%, 38.09% and 42.86% of the sample, respectively. The most common region demonstrating absence of bone repair was the middle third. The anterior third of the midpalatal suture was repaired in all patients.

conclusionsA decreased bone density was observed after the retention period when compared to pre-expansion stage. Most adult patients demonstrated incomplete repair of the midpalatal suture 16 months after MARPE. However, adequate bone repair covering more than half of the hard palate extension was observed in 80.95% of the patients.

Indexed as

Cranial SuturesPalatal Expansion TechniqueAdultCone-Beam Computed TomographyFemaleHumansMaleMaxillaPalatePalate, HardReproducibility of ResultsSuturesCone-beam computed tomographyPalatal expansion techniqueSkeletal anchorage

Identifiers

PMID36244995
PMCPMC9573844
OpenAlexW4306361781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.