Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36244993›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2022

Federated learning algorithms for generalized mixed-effects model (GLMM) on horizontally partitioned data from distributed sources.

Wentao Li, Jiayi Tong, Md Monowar Anjum, Noman Mohammed, Yong Chen, Xiaoqian Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Federated systems for automated infection surveillance: a perspective.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wentao LiSchool of Biomedical Informatics, UTHealth, 7000 Fannin St, Houston, 77030, TX, USA. wentao.li@uth.tmc.edu.
Jiayi TongDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, 19104, PA, USA.
Md Monowar AnjumDepartment of Computer Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Noman MohammedDepartment of Computer Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Yong ChenDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, 19104, PA, USA.
Xiaoqian JiangSchool of Biomedical Informatics, UTHealth, 7000 Fannin St, Houston, 77030, TX, USA.

Funding

Open Health Natural Language Processing CollaboratoryU01TR002062 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI JIANG, XIAOQIAN, LIU, HONGFANG · 2017 to 2021
$7.6M
Finding Combinatorial Drug Repositioning Therapy For Alzheimer'S Disease And Related DementiasR01AG066749 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI JIANG, XIAOQIAN, ZHENG, WENJIN JIM · 2020 to 2024
$4.4M
Dynamic learning for post-vaccine event prediction using temporal information in VAERSR01AI130460 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI CHEN, YONG, TAO, CUI · 2017 to 2021
$3.4M
A General Framework to Account for Outcome Reporting Bias in Systematic ReviewsR01LM012607 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CHEN, YONG · 2017 to 2020
$1.4M
SHARE: Statistical Health Information Release with Differential PrivacyR01GM114612 · NIGMS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI XIONG, LI · 2015 to 2017
$1.0M
NCATS NIH HHS U01 TR002062NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI130460NIA NIH HHS R01 AG066749NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM114612NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012607
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis paper developed federated solutions based on two approximation algorithms to achieve federated generalized linear mixed effect models (GLMM). The paper also proposed a solution for numerical errors and singularity issues. And showed the two proposed methods can perform well in revealing the significance of parameter in distributed datasets, comparing to a centralized GLMM algorithm from R package ('lme4') as the baseline model.

methodsThe log-likelihood function of GLMM is approximated by two numerical methods (Laplace approximation and Gaussian Hermite approximation, abbreviated as LA and GH), which supports federated decomposition of GLMM to bring computation to data. To solve the numerical errors and singularity issues, the loss-less estimation of log-sum-exponential trick and the adaptive regularization strategy was used to tackle the problems caused by federated settings.

resultsOur proposed method can handle GLMM to accommodate hierarchical data with multiple non-independent levels of observations in a federated setting. The experiment results demonstrate comparable (LA) and superior (GH) performances with simulated and real-world data.

conclusionWe modified and compared federated GLMMs with different approximations, which can support researchers in analyzing versatile biomedical data to accommodate mixed effects and address non-independence due to hierarchical structures (i.e., institutes, region, country, etc.).

Indexed as

AlgorithmsResearch DesignComputer SimulationHumansLikelihood FunctionsLinear ModelsFederated learningGauss–Hermite approximationGLMMLaplace approximationMixed effects

Identifiers

PMID36244993
PMCPMC9569919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.