Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36243820›Full record

ArticleNPJ Parkinson's disease2022

Using former carers' expertise in peer support for carers of people with Parkinson's Disease.

Angelika D Geerlings, Marjan J Meinders, Bastiaan R Bloem, Marjolein A van der Marck

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ Parkinson's disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Angelika D GeerlingsRadboud university medical center; Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour; Department of Neurology; Center of Expertise for Parkinson & Movement Disorders, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Marjan J MeindersRadboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6491-7035
Bastiaan R BloemRadboud university medical center; Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour; Department of Neurology; Center of Expertise for Parkinson & Movement Disorders, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6371-3337
Marjolein A van der MarckRadboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Geriatrics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. marjolein.vandermarck@radboudumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5540-7479
Radboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Informal carers gain unique experience and knowledge when caring for a loved person. However, this knowledge often remains unused after their loved one with Parkinson's disease (PD) has passed away. Hence, two opportunities are currently being missed: sharing this unique experience could support current informal carers and offer the bereaved former carers the option to continue to fulfil a meaningful role. This study aimed to identify the unmet needs of current carers, and to examine the interest, willingness and requirements of both current and former carers for peer-to-peer support. Data were collected from August 2020 to February 2021 through questionnaires examining (1) resources and needs for support; (2) topics for support and advice; and (3) preferences for peer-to-peer initiatives. Open questions were analyzed thematically, after open coding. In total, 141 current and 15 former informal carers participated. Current carers were mainly women (68%) and partner of a person with PD (86%). Former carers were mainly women (80%) who had cared for a partner or parent (53%; 47%) with PD. Almost half of the current carers expressed need for additional support in finding balance, changing relationships, and learning how to cope with lack of emotions and motivation. Half of the carers were positive about the opportunity to exchange experiences and knowledge with former carers. Willingness among former carers for providing peer-to-peer support was high (87%). In both groups, having a degree of commonality with peers was considered an essential requirement. These findings provide guidance for developing peer-to-peer support programs, incorporating former carers.

Identifiers

PMID36243820
PMCPMC9569356
OpenAlexW4306293694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.