Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36243795›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Intra-specific variation in sensitivity of Bombus terrestris and Osmia bicornis to three pesticides.

Alberto Linguadoca, Margret Jürison, Sara Hellström, Edward A Straw, Peter Šima, Reet Karise, Cecilia Costa, Giorgia Serra, Roberto Colombo, Robert J Paxton and 2 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
12.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Alberto Linguadoca *Centre for Ecology, Evolution & Behaviour, Department of Biological Sciences, School for Life Sciences and the Environment, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, UK.
Margret Jürison *Chair of Plant Health, Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Tartu, Estonia. margret.jyrison@emu.ee.
Sara Hellström *General Zoology, Institute for Biology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Edward A StrawCentre for Ecology, Evolution & Behaviour, Department of Biological Sciences, School for Life Sciences and the Environment, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, UK.
Peter ŠimaDepartment of R&D, Koppert s.r.o., Nové Zámky, Slovakia.
Reet KariseChair of Plant Health, Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Tartu, Estonia.
Cecilia CostaCREA Research Centre for Agriculture and Environment, via di Corticella 133, 40128, Bologna, Italy.
Giorgia SerraCREA Research Centre for Agriculture and Environment, via di Corticella 133, 40128, Bologna, Italy.
Roberto ColomboCREA Research Centre for Agriculture and Environment, via di Corticella 133, 40128, Bologna, Italy.
Robert J PaxtonGeneral Zoology, Institute for Biology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Marika MändChair of Plant Health, Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Tartu, Estonia.
Mark J F BrownCentre for Ecology, Evolution & Behaviour, Department of Biological Sciences, School for Life Sciences and the Environment, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, UK.
Estonian University of Life Sciences · EEResearch Centre for Cereal and Industrial Crops · ITMartin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DERoyal Holloway University of London · GBEuropean Food Safety Authority · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is growing evidence that pesticides may be among the causes of worldwide bee declines, which has resulted in repeated calls for their increased scrutiny in regulatory assessments. One recurring concern is that the current frameworks may be biased towards assessing risks to the honey bee. This paradigm requires extrapolating toxicity information across bee species. Most research effort has therefore focused on quantifying differences in sensitivity across species. However, our understanding of how responses to pesticides may vary within a species is still very poor. Here we take the first steps towards filling this knowledge gap by comparing acute, lethal hazards in sexes and castes of the eusocial bee Bombus terrestris and in sexes of the solitary bee Osmia bicornis after oral and contact exposure to the pesticides sulfoxaflor, Amistar (azoxystrobin) and glyphosate. We show that sensitivity towards pesticides varies significantly both within and across species. Bee weight was a meaningful predictor of pesticide susceptibility. However, weight could not fully explain the observed differences, which suggests the existence of unexplored mechanisms regulating pesticide sensitivity across bee sexes and castes. Our data show that intra-specific responses are an overlooked yet important aspect of the risk assessment of pesticides in bees.

Indexed as

PesticidesAnimalsBeesPyrimidinesRisk AssessmentStrobilurinsazoxystrobinPesticidesPyrimidinesStrobilurins

Identifiers

PMID36243795
PMCPMC9569340
OpenAlexW4306291708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.