Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36243731›Full record

SynthesisNPJ biofilms and microbiomes2022

The gut microbiome-metabolome dataset collection: a curated resource for integrative meta-analysis.

Efrat Muller, Yadid M Algavi, Elhanan Borenstein

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in NPJ biofilms and microbiomes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Meta-Analysis of the Gut Microbiome: An African American Representation.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Nutrients · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Efrat MullerBlavatnik School of Computer Science, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-0193-0686
Yadid M AlgaviSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Elhanan BorensteinBlavatnik School of Computer Science, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. elbo@tauex.tau.ac.il.ORCID 0000-0003-3002-0945

Funding

The Dog Aging Project: Genetic and Environmental Determinants of Healthy Aging in Companion Dogs Competitive RevisionU19AG057377 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI KEENE, CHRISTOPHER DIRK, PROMISLOW, DANIEL EDWARD · 2018 to 2023
$29.0M
NIA NIH HHS U19 AG057377
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Integrative analysis of microbiome and metabolome data obtained from human fecal samples is a promising avenue for better understanding the interplay between bacteria and metabolites in the human gut, in both health and disease. However, acquiring, processing, and unifying such datasets from multiple sources is a daunting and challenging task. Here we present a publicly available, simple-to-use, curated dataset collection of paired fecal microbiome-metabolome data from multiple cohorts. This data resource allows researchers to easily obtain multiple fully processed and integrated microbiome-metabolome datasets, facilitating the discovery of universal microbe-metabolite links, benchmark various microbiome-metabolome integration tools, and compare newly identified microbe-metabolite findings to other published datasets.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeFecesHumansMetabolomeMetabolomicsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID36243731
PMCPMC9569371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.