Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36243695›Full record

ReviewBMC primary care2022

Using a mixed method to identify communication skills training priorities for Chinese general practitioners in diabetes care.

Mi Yao, Gang Yuan, Kai Lin, Lijuan Liu, Hao Tang, Jieying Xie, Xinxin Ji, Rongxin Wang, Binkai Li, Jiajia Hao and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.

Mi YaoGeneral Practice Department, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Gang YuanDepartment of Geriatrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Kai LinFamily Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China.
Lijuan LiuDepartment of Cardiovascular, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Hao TangDepartment of General Practice, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Jieying XieNanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xinxin JiShantou University Medical College, Shantou, China.
Rongxin WangShayuan Community Health Service Centre, Guangzhou, China.
Binkai LiDepartment of General Practice, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Jiajia HaoDepartment of General Practice, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Huichang QiuDepartment of General Practice, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou, China.
Dongying ZhangNational Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Hai LiDepartment of Endocrinology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Shamil HaroonInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Dawn JacksonCollege of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. Jackson.2@bham.ac.uk.
Wei ChenDepartment of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China. chenwei99@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Kar Keung ChengInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Richard LehmanInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
University of Birmingham · GBThe First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University · CNGuangzhou First People's Hospital · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University · CNGuangzhou Medical University · CNShantou University · CNShantou University Medical College · CNSouthern Medical University · CNSun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn China diabetes care is gradually shifting from secondary to primary care with great infrastructure investment and GP training. However, most GPs in China lack communication skills training, which is a huge obstacle in communication with their patients in primary care. In this study we seek to identify training priorities that is evidence-based, appropriate for the context of primary care in China, and that meet the real needs of both GPs and people with diabetes.

methodsA mixed method approach was used. A conceptual framework was designed based on the MRC framework, action research and adult learning theories. Through a systematic review of the literature and qualitative research with GPs and patients with diabetes, a list of communication skills training components was developed by the research team. A modified nominal group technique (NGT) with GPs was used to evaluate these contents. Purposive sampling was used to recruit a variation of participants (age, work area, practice years and education background) from general practices in Guangzhou city, China. Eight structured nominal groups were facilitated to elicit the views of group members, and participants rated the 9-point Likert scale of importance and feasibility of the training items independently, before and after focus groups. The ranking of each item was calculated, based on the mean Likert score ratings from all participants. Video recordings of four NGT group discussions were thematically analysed using the Framework Method to explore reasons for any differences in rating items.

results29 males and 29 female GPs from 28 general practices participated in NGT group discussions, with a mean age of 38.5 years and mean 12.3 years of practice experience. Based on the mean scores of importance and feasibility rating scores, the top 3 ranked priorities for communication training were 'health education' (importance 8.39, feasibility 7.67), 'discussing and explaining blood glucose monitoring' (8.31, 7.46), and 'diabetes complications and cardiovascular disease risk communication' (8.36, 7.12). Five main themes were identified from focus group discussions through qualitative analysis: 'impact on diabetes patients', 'GP attitudes towards communication skills', 'patient-related factors influencing the application of communication skills by GPs, 'local contextual factors', and 'training implementation'.

conclusionsPriorities for communication skills training for Chinese GPs in diabetes care were identified. These are set in the context of GPs' current experience of communication with patients in China who have diabetes, which is often unsatisfactory. This study describes the baseline from which better primary care for diabetes in China needs to be developed. Based on suggestions from GPs themselves, it identifies an agenda for improvement in communication as a key component of diabetes care in China.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusGeneral PractitionersAdultBlood GlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringCommunicationFemaleHumansMaleBlood GlucoseCommunicationDiabetes careGeneral practitionersTraining

Identifiers

PMID36243695
PMCPMC9569069
OpenAlexW4306291267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.