ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2022
Assessing the added value of context during stress detection from wearable data.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning Frameworks for Wearable-Based Stress Modeling in Naturalistic Settings: Scoping Review.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Article
- From Sensing to Sense-Making: A Framework for On-Person Intelligence with Wearable Biosensors and Edge LLMs.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Wearable devices and ecological momentary assessment EMA in the workplace: A study protocol on work stress assessment.PloS one · 2026Article
- Implementation of a Stress Biomarker and Development of a Deep Neural Network-Based Multi-Mental State Classification Model.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Requirements and Concerns of Individuals Remitted From Depression for an Early Relapse Detection mHealth App: Focus Group Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2025Article
- Heterogeneous effects of physical activity on physiological stress during pregnancy.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- Stress and Emotion Open Access Data: A Review on Datasets, Modalities, Methods, Challenges, and Future Research Perspectives.Journal of healthcare informatics research · 2025Review
- Environmental Triggers of Specific Subtypes of Agitation in People With Dementia: Observational Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Observational
- Stress management with HRV following AI, semantic ontology, genetic algorithm and tree explainer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- mBrain: towards the continuous follow-up and headache classification of primary headache disorder patients.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022Observational
- Designing a just-in-time adaptive intervention with trigger detection and a generative chatbot: Smoking cessation use case.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInsomnia, eating disorders, heart problems and even strokes are just some of the illnesses that reveal the negative impact of stress overload on health and well-being. Early detection of stress is therefore of utmost importance. Whereas the gold-standard for detecting stress is by means of questionnaires, more recent work uses wearable sensors to find continuous and qualitative physical markers of stress. As some physiological stress responses, e.g. increased heart rate or sweating and chills, might also occur when doing sports, a more profound approach is needed for stress detection than purely considering physiological data.
methodsIn this paper, we analyse the added value of context information during stress detection from wearable data. We do so by comparing the performance of models trained purely on physiological data and models trained on physiological and context data. We consider the user's activity and hours of sleep as context information, where we compare the influence of user-given context versus machine learning derived context.
resultsContext-aware models reach higher accuracy and lower standard deviations in comparison to the baseline (physiological) models. We also observe higher accuracy and improved weighted F1 score when incorporating machine learning predicted, instead of user-given, activities as context information.
conclusionsIn this paper we show that considering context information when performing stress detection from wearables leads to better performance. We also show that it is possible to move away from human labeling and rely only on the wearables for both physiology and context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.