Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36243128›Full record

ArticleContraception2023

Contraception claims by medication for opioid use disorder prescription status among insured women with opioid use disorder, United States, 2018.

Sonal Goyal, Michael Monsour, Jean Y Ko, Kathryn M Curtis, Maura K Whiteman, Kelsey C Coy, Shanna Cox, Lisa Romero

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contraception, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Contraceptive Method Provision Patterns Among Rural and Urban Kentucky Medicaid Enrollees.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sonal GoyalDivision of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States; Epidemic Intelligence Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Michael MonsourDivision of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Jean Y KoDivision of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Kathryn M CurtisDivision of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Maura K WhitemanDivision of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Kelsey C CoyDivision of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States; Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, TN, United States.
Shanna CoxDivision of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Lisa RomeroDivision of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States. Electronic address: eon1@cdc.gov.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USOak Ridge Associated Universities · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

OBJECTIVE(S): To understand how contraception method use differed between women prescribed and not prescribed medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) among commercially-insured and Medicaid-insured women. STUDY

designIBM Watson Health MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters database and the Multi-State Medicaid database were used to calculate the (1) crude prevalence, and (2) adjusted odds ratios (adjusted for demographic characteristics) of using long-acting reversible or short-acting hormonal contraception methods or female sterilization compared with none of these methods (no method) in 2018 by MOUD status among women with OUD, aged 20 to 49 years, with continuous health insurance coverage through commercial insurance or Medicaid for ≥6 years. Claims data was used to define contraception use. Fisher exact test or χ

resultsOnly 41% of commercially-insured and Medicaid-insured women with OUD were prescribed MOUD. Medicaid-insured women with OUD prescribed MOUD had a significantly lower crude prevalence of using no method (71.1% vs 79.0%) and higher odds of using female sterilization (aOR, 1.33; 95% CI: 1.06-1.67 vs no method) than those not prescribed MOUD. Among commercially-insured women there were no differences in contraceptive use by MOUD status and 66% used no method.

conclusionsAmong women with ≥ 6 years of continuous insurance coverage, contraceptive use differed by MOUD status and insurance. Prescribing MOUD for women with OUD can be improved to ensure quality care. IMPLICATIONS: Only two in five women with OUD had evidence of being prescribed MOUD, and majority did not use prescription contraception or female sterilization. Our findings support opportunities to improve prescribing for MOUD and integrate contraception and MOUD services to improve clinical care among women with OUD.

Indexed as

Opioid-Related DisordersContraceptionContraceptive AgentsFemaleHumansMedicaidPrescriptionsUnited StatesContraceptive AgentsBirth controlCommercial insuranceHealth insuranceMarketscanMedicaidMedication assisted therapy

Identifiers

PMID36243128
PMCPMC9722562
OpenAlexW4304689262

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.