Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36242754›Full record

ReviewCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2022

Sex-Based Differences in Adult ACL Reconstruction Outcomes.

Katherine Branche, Hannah L Bradsell, Alex Lencioni, Rachel M Frank

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Katherine BrancheUniversity of Missouri Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA. kcb7tr@umsystem.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2844-6242
Hannah L BradsellDepartment of Orthopedics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Alex LencioniUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Rachel M FrankDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12631 E 17th Ave, Mail Stop B202, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewIn the setting of ever improving outcomes following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, both objectively and subjectively, there remains continued interest in better understanding the differences in outcomes between male and female patients. The current review investigates the recent literature surrounding the roles of biological sex in adult ACL reconstruction outcomes. RECENT

findingsWithin the past five years, the most prominent and recurrent difference between male and female patient cohorts is the subjective report of pain and function. Female patients have been consistently shown to have worse self-reported outcomes following ACL reconstruction. Specific and quantifiable subjective outcomes that are highlighted include the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score, the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS). Current research on the topic of biological sex-based differences in ACL reconstruction outcomes can be divided into four main categories: patient-reported subjective outcomes; physical assessment and gait analysis; kinematics; and rates of reinjury, revision, and contralateral reconstruction. This chapter provides a summary of recent literature focused on these four main areas of interest related to ACL reconstruction outcomes in males and females.

Indexed as

ACL reconstructionBiological sexDifferential outcomes

Identifiers

PMID36242754
PMCPMC9789217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.