Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36242738›Full record

ReviewCurrent rheumatology reports2022

Use of Imaging in Axial Spondyloarthritis for Diagnosis and Assessment of Disease Remission in the Year 2022.

Ann-Sophie De Craemer, Zuzanna Łukasik, Philippe Carron

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current rheumatology reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ann-Sophie De CraemerFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-7062-8934
Zuzanna ŁukasikFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9551-3578
Philippe CarronFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. philippe.carron@ugent.be.ORCID 0000-0001-9254-6171

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medical imaging remains the cornerstone of diagnostics and follow-up of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) patients. With the lack of specific biomarkers allowing monitoring of disease activity and progression, clinicians refer to imaging modalities for accurate evaluation of the axSpA burden. Technological advances and increasing availability of modern imaging techniques such as MRI have enabled faster diagnosis of the disease, hence dramatically changed the diagnostic delay and improved the prognosis and functional outcomes for axSpA patients.Active sacroiliitis as visualized by MRI has been widely accepted as a diagnostic tool, and definitions of inflammatory and structural lesions within the axial skeleton have been developed. Recently, it has been acknowledged that bone marrow edema, suggestive of sacroiliitis, is a common finding among non-SpA patients, and could be attributed to mechanical loading or accumulate with age in healthy individuals. Therefore, it is crucial to distinguish between true pathological and concealing imaging findings, not only for diagnostic but also for disease remission purposes. New imaging modalities, aimed for in vivo visualization of specific molecular processes, could be employed to cross-validate findings from techniques used in daily clinical practice. This review critically evaluates the use of different imaging modalities for diagnosis and assessment of disease remission in axSpA in the year 2022.

Indexed as

Axial SpondyloarthritisSacroiliitisSpondylarthritisDelayed DiagnosisHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingSacroiliac JointAxial spondyloarthritisComputed tomographyConventional radiographyDiagnosisMagnetic resonance imagingRemission

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.