Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36242724›Full record

ArticleExperimental & applied acarology2022

A haplodiploid mite adjusts fecundity and sex ratio in response to density changes during the reproductive period.

Nuwan Weerawansha, Qiao Wang, Xiong Zhao He

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental & applied acarology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nuwan WeerawanshaSchool of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Private Bag 11222, Palmerston North, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0373-255X
Qiao WangSchool of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Private Bag 11222, Palmerston North, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6494-2097
Xiong Zhao HeSchool of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Private Bag 11222, Palmerston North, New Zealand. x.z.he@massey.ac.nz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3956-4498

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Population density is one of the main socio-environmental factors that have critical impacts on reproduction of animals. Consequently, they need to adjust their reproductive strategies in response to changes of local population density. In this study we used a haplodiploid spider mite, Tetranychus ludeni Zacher (Acari: Tetranychidae), to test how population density dynamics during the reproductive period altered female reproductive performance. We demonstrate that females produced fewer eggs with a significantly higher female-biased sex ratio in dense populations. Reducing fecundity and increasing daughter production in a dense environment could be an advantageous strategy to minimise the intensity of local food competition. However, females also reduced their fecundity after arrival in a new site of larger area from a dense population, which may be associated with higher web production costs because females need to produce more webs to cover the larger area. There was no trade-off between egg number and size, and egg size had little impact on reproductive fitness. Therefore, T. ludeni females could adapt to the shift of population density during their reproductive period by manipulating the fecundity and offspring sex ratio but not the egg size.

Indexed as

MitesSex RatioAnimalsFemaleFertilityMalePopulation DensityPopulation DynamicsReproductionFecundityResource competitionSex ratioSocial environmentSpider mite

Identifiers

PMID36242724
PMCPMC9732065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.