Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36242709›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2022

High-risk lesions in the breast diagnosed by MRI-guided core biopsy: upgrade rates and features associated with malignancy.

Eumee Cha, Emily B Ambinder, Eniola T Oluyemi, Lisa A Mullen, Babita Panigrahi, Joanna Rossi, Philip A Di Carlo, Kelly S Myers

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eumee ChaJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD, 21205, USA.
Emily B AmbinderDepartment of Radiology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 601 N Caroline St, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Eniola T OluyemiDepartment of Radiology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 601 N Caroline St, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Lisa A MullenDepartment of Radiology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 601 N Caroline St, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Babita PanigrahiDepartment of Radiology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 601 N Caroline St, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Joanna RossiDepartment of Radiology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 601 N Caroline St, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Philip A Di CarloDepartment of Radiology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 601 N Caroline St, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Kelly S MyersDepartment of Radiology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 601 N Caroline St, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA. kmyers25@jhmi.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6614-0901
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study assessed the upgrade rates of high-risk lesions (HRLs) in the breast diagnosed by MRI-guided core biopsy and evaluated imaging and clinical features associated with upgrade to malignancy.

methodsThis IRB-approved, retrospective study included MRI-guided breast biopsy exams yielding HRLs from August 1, 2011, to August 31, 2020. HRLs included atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS), atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH), radial scar, and papilloma. Only lesions that underwent excision or at least 2 years of MRI imaging follow-up were included. For each HRL, patient history, imaging features, and outcomes were recorded.

resultsSeventy-two lesions in 65 patients were included in the study, with 8/72 (11.1%) of the lesions upgraded to malignancy. Upgrade rates were 16.7% (2/12) for ADH, 100% (1/1) for pleomorphic LCIS, 40% (2/5) for other LCIS, 0% (0/19) for ALH, 0% (0/18) for papilloma, and 0% (0/7) for radial scar/complex sclerosing lesion. Additionally, two cases of marked ADH bordering on DCIS and one case of marked ALH bordering on LCIS, were upgraded. Lesions were more likely to be upgraded if they presented as T2 hypointense (versus isotense, OR 6.46, 95% CI 1.27-32.92) or as linear or segmental non-mass enhancement (NME, versus focal or regional, p = 0.008).

conclusionOur data support the recommendation that ADH and LCIS on MRI-guided biopsy warrant surgical excision due to high upgrade rates. HRLs that present as T2 hypointense, or as linear or segmental NME, should be viewed with suspicion as these were associated with higher upgrade rates to malignancy.

Indexed as

Breast Carcinoma In SituBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingFibrocystic Breast DiseasePapillomaPrecancerous ConditionsBiopsy, Large-Core NeedleBreastCicatrixFemaleHumansHyperplasiaImage-Guided BiopsyMagnetic Resonance ImagingRetrospective StudiesHigh-risk lesionsMRI-guided core biopsyUpgrade rate

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.