ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2023
Landmark tracking in 4D ultrasound using generalized representation learning.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Analysis of intra- and inter-observer variability in 4D liver ultrasound landmark labeling.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeIn this study, we present and validate a novel concept for target tracking in 4D ultrasound. The key idea is to replace image patch similarity metrics by distances in a latent representation. For this, 3D ultrasound patches are mapped into a representation space using sliced-Wasserstein autoencoders.
methodsA novel target tracking method for 4D ultrasound is presented that performs tracking in a representation space instead of in images space. Sliced-Wasserstein autoencoders are trained in an unsupervised manner which are used to map 3D ultrasound patches into a representation space. The tracking procedure is based on a greedy algorithm approach and measuring distances between representation vectors to relocate the target . The proposed algorithm is validated on an in vivo data set of liver images. Furthermore, three different concepts for training the autoencoder are presented to provide cross-patient generalizability, aiming at minimal training time on data of the individual patient.
resultsEight annotated 4D ultrasound sequences are used to test the tracking method. Tracking could be performed in all sequences using all autoencoder training approaches. A mean tracking error of 3.23 mm could be achieved using generalized fine-tuned autoencoders. It is shown that using generalized autoencoders and fine-tuning them achieves better tracking results than training subject individual autoencoders.
conclusionIt could be shown that distances between encoded image patches in a representation space can serve as a meaningful measure of the image patch similarity, even under realistic deformations of the anatomical structure. Based on that, we could validate the proposed tracking algorithm in an in vivo setting. Furthermore, our results indicate that using generalized autoencoders, fine-tuning on only a small number of patches from the individual patient provides promising results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.