Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36242584›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2022

A systematic assessment of cell type deconvolution algorithms for DNA methylation data.

Junyan Song, Pei-Fen Kuan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Unifying DNA methylation-basedBioinformatics advances · 2025
    Article
  8. Methods in DNA methylation array dataset analysis: A review.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Junyan SongDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY.
Pei-Fen KuanDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY.ORCID 0000-0001-7861-916X

Funding

Changes in monocyte transcriptome as a predictor of cognitive decline in WTC responders: a longitudinal studyU01OH012257 · OH · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI CLOUSTON, SEAN, KUAN, PEI-FEN · 2021 to 2023
$1.5M
Longitudinal genome-wide transcriptome study of PTSD symptom change in WTC respondersU01OH011478 · OH · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI KUAN, PEI-FEN · 2017 to 2019
$1.5M
ACL HHS U01OH011478NIOSH CDC HHS U01 OH011478NIOSH CDC HHS U01 OH012257
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We performed systematic assessment of computational deconvolution methods that play an important role in the estimation of cell type proportions from bulk methylation data. The proposed framework methylDeConv (available as an R package) integrates several deconvolution methods for methylation profiles (Illumina HumanMethylation450 and MethylationEPIC arrays) and offers different cell-type-specific CpG selection to construct the extended reference library which incorporates the main immune cell subsets, epithelial cells and cell-free DNAs. We compared the performance of different deconvolution algorithms via simulations and benchmark datasets and further investigated the associations of the estimated cell type proportions to cancer therapy in breast cancer and subtypes in melanoma methylation case studies. Our results indicated that the deconvolution based on the extended reference library is critical to obtain accurate estimates of cell proportions in non-blood tissues.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationNeoplasmsAlgorithmsGene LibraryHumanscell type heterogeneitydeconvolutionDNA methylationepigeneticsEWAS

Identifiers

PMID36242584
PMCPMC9947552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.