Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36242543›Full record

ArticleFamily practice2023

General practitioners' perceptions of pharmacists working in general practice: a qualitative interview study.

Eoin Hurley, Elaine Walsh, Tony Foley, Clara H Heinrich, Stephen Byrne, Kieran Dalton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Family practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Do GPs benefit from having MHPs as part of the practice?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eoin HurleyPharmaceutical Care Research Group, School of Pharmacy, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-6895-8061
Elaine WalshDepartment of General Practice, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-0718-4207
Tony FoleyDepartment of General Practice, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-3205-3871
Clara H HeinrichPharmaceutical Care Research Group, School of Pharmacy, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-8296-4393
Stephen ByrnePharmaceutical Care Research Group, School of Pharmacy, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-3141-7004
Kieran DaltonPharmaceutical Care Research Group, School of Pharmacy, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-1209-8079

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPharmacists are being increasingly employed as part of general practice teams globally, and their input has been associated with several clinical and economic benefits. However, there is a paucity of research focussing on general practitioners' (GPs') perceptions of pharmacist integration into practices in countries where this novel role for pharmacists is yet to become commonplace.

objectiveTo explore GPs' perceptions of integrating pharmacists into general practices and to identify the behavioural determinants of GPs integrating pharmacists into practices.

methodsSemistructured interviews were conducted with GPs practising in Ireland, who were sampled using a combination of purposive, convenience, and snowball sampling. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim, which then were analysed using conventional content analysis and directed content analysis employing the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF).

resultsSeventeen GPs were interviewed between November 2021 and February 2022. Seven TDF domains were identified as predominant in influencing GPs' perceptions of pharmacist integration into general practices. These perceptions were mostly positive, especially regarding patient outcomes, cost savings, and improving access to care. However, there were concerns about funding the role, affecting others' workloads, and pharmacists' training needs to work in practices.

conclusionThis study's theory-informed insight provides a deeper understanding of GPs' perceptions of pharmacists working in general practice and behaviours which can be targeted to help optimize integration. These findings should be utilized in future service development to preempt and address GPs' concerns ahead of pharmacist integration, as well as to inform the development of general practice-based pharmacist roles going forward.

Indexed as

General PracticeGeneral PractitionersAttitude of Health PersonnelHumansPharmacistsQualitative Researchgeneral practicegeneral practitionerspharmacistsprimary healthcarequalitative research

Identifiers

PMID36242543
PMCPMC10047619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.