Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36242026›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2022

Is progress being made on Canada's palliative care framework and action plan? A survey of stakeholder perspectives.

Barbara Pesut, Sally Thorne, Anne Huisken, David Kenneth Wright, Kenneth Chambaere, Carol Tishelman, Sunita Ghosh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Barbara PesutProfessor School of Nursing, Principal Research Chair in Palliative and End-of-Life Care, University of British Columbia Okanagan. ARTS 3rdFloor, 1147 Research Road, Kelowna, BC, V1V 1V7, Canada. Barb.pesut@ubc.ca.
Sally ThorneProfessor School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 2B5, Canada.
Anne HuiskenResearch Coordinator Palliative and End of Life Research Lab, University of British Columbia Okanagan, BC, Kelowna, Canada.
David Kenneth WrightAssociate Professor, School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8M5, Canada.
Kenneth ChambaereProfessor Public Health, Sociology & Ethics of the End of Life, End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, C. Heymanslaan 10, B-9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Carol TishelmanProfessor of Innovative Care Karoliinska Institutet, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics Division of Innovative Care Research, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sunita GhoshAssociate Clinical Professor/Research Scientist, University of Alberta/Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Canada.

Funding

CIHR PJT-169144
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe legalization of Medical Assistance in Dying in Canada in 2016 provided new impetus for improving palliative care. This commitment to improvement included the development of a National Palliative Care Framework and Action Plan. The purpose of this study was to understand the progress made in palliative care since 2016 from the perspective of persons working and volunteering in palliative care and compare geographic differences.

methodsA digital survey was developed from goals identified in Canada's Palliative Care Framework and Action Plan and administered online using Qualtrics. Participants were recruited through national palliative care organizations. The survey included both quantitative survey items designed to evaluate improvements across 5 domains and 29 items and included open-ended questions about impacts, innovations, and ongoing challenges. Descriptive statistics were generated for survey domains, items, and demographic variables. Geographic differences were compared using Independent-Samples Kruskal-Wallis test. Qualitative data was analyzed inductively into themes.

resultsOne hundred fifty surveys met inclusion criteria and were analysed. Overall, the most improvement was reported in palliative care education and the least improvement was reported in support for family caregivers. Items on which respondents reported the most improvement included healthcare provider education in palliative care, advance care planning, and use of technology. Items on which respondents reported the least improvement were respite for family caregivers, access to bereavement services, and in-home support for family caregivers. Notably, rural participants reported more statistically significant improvements in the domains of education, access, and research and data collection than their urban counterparts. However, rural participants reported less improvement in places to die when home is not preferable. The COVID-19 pandemic was a significant contributor to these perceived improvements and ongoing challenges.

conclusionCanada's Framework and Action Plan sets out a roadmap for improving palliative care in Canada. Participants in this survey noted significant improvements in key areas, a notable accomplishment amidst the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Some improvements were a result of greater use of distance technology. Further leveraging these improvements will make an important contribution to solving some of the rural and remote palliative care issues that have arisen from Canada's unique geography.

Indexed as

COVID-19Palliative CareCanadaHumansPandemicsSurveys and QuestionnairesCanadaPalliative careQualitativeQuality improvementSurvey

Identifiers

PMID36242026
PMCPMC9561335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.