Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36242007›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2022

Restoration and maintenance of segment lordosis in oblique lumbar interbody fusion.

Ke Gong, Yang Lin, Zhibin Wang, Feng Li, Wei Xiong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ke GongDepartment of Orthopaedics, Tongji Hospital affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong, University of Science & Technology, No.1095 Jie Fang Avenue, Wuhan, China.
Yang LinDepartment of Orthopaedics, Tongji Hospital affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong, University of Science & Technology, No.1095 Jie Fang Avenue, Wuhan, China. linyangmd@hust.edu.cn.
Zhibin WangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Tongji Hospital affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong, University of Science & Technology, No.1095 Jie Fang Avenue, Wuhan, China.
Feng LiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Tongji Hospital affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong, University of Science & Technology, No.1095 Jie Fang Avenue, Wuhan, China.
Wei XiongDepartment of Orthopaedics, Tongji Hospital affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong, University of Science & Technology, No.1095 Jie Fang Avenue, Wuhan, China. xcxgreatwellus@hotmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRestoration of the segment lordosis angle (SLA) can effectively reduce the risk of adjacent segment degeneration. This study aimed to perform a comprehensive multifactor analysis of the risk factors affecting restoration and maintenance of the SLA in oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF).

methodsSeventy-three patients (93 segments) who underwent OLIF with posterior pedicle screw fixation due to lumbar degenerative disease between January 2015 and December 2019 were included. Radiographic parameters including the middle disc height (MDH), segment lordosis angle (SLA), cage center point ratio (CPR), cage subsidence, and L1 CT Hounsfield Unit (HU) were measured.

resultsThe postoperative SLA increased from 3.5° to 8.7°, and decreased to 6.7° at the last follow-up. Multivariate analysis showed that preoperative SLA, CPR and cage subsidence were significantly correlated with SLA restoration. The significant correlations were between restoration of SLA with pre-operative SLA (r=-0.575, adjusted R2 = 0.323, P < 0.01) and between SLA restoration and CPR (r = 0.526, adjusted R2 = 0.268, P < 0.01). Cage subsidence was found in 12.9% (12/93) of segments and was the main factor affecting SLA loss (4.2 ± 1.0° versus 1.7 ± 2.1°, P < 0.01). Logistic regression analysis showed that CPR < 50%, L1 CT HU < 110 and cage height > preoperative MDH were risk factors for cage subsidence. Cages placed anteriorly (CPR ≥ 50%) showed a large SLA increase and lower incidence of cage subsidence than those placed posteriorly (5.9 ± 3.9° versus 4.2 ± 3.2°, P < 0.05; 1.8% versus 28.9%, P < 0.05, respectively).

conclusionSLA restoration is dependent on preoperative SLA, cage subsidence and cage position in OLIF. Cage position is the key determinant of SLA restoration and placement of the cage at the anterior position (CPR ≥ 50%) can achieve better restoration of the SLA and reduce the incidence of cage subsidence.

Indexed as

LordosisSpinal FusionHumansLumbar VertebraeLumbosacral RegionRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeCage subsidenceLumbar degenerative diseaseOblique lumbar interbody fusionSegment lordosis angle

Identifiers

PMID36242007
PMCPMC9563436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.