Observational studyBMC pulmonary medicine2022
Antimicrobial therapy of community-acquired pneumonia during stewardship efforts and a coronavirus pandemic: an observational study.
Observational study in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Microbiological findings and antibiotic treatment in community-acquired pneumonia: a retrospective cohort study.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Resistance to Lefamulin: An Evaluation of Data from In Vitro Antimicrobial Susceptibility Studies.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Appropriateness of empiric antibiotic therapy for community-acquired pneumonia: A multicenter cross-sectional study.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2025Article
- Assessment of disease severity in hospitalized community-acquired pneumonia by the use of validated scoring systems.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025Article
- Risk factors for detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in clinical samples upon hospital admission.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2025Article
- Impact of complex interventions on antibacterial therapy and etiological diagnostics in community-acquired pneumonia: a 12-month pre- and post-intervention study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- D-PRISM: a global survey-based study to assess diagnostic and treatment approaches in pneumonia managed in intensive care.Critical care (London, England) · 2024Article
- Accordance of Registered Drug Packages with Guideline-Recommended Treatment Durations for Community-Acquired Pneumonia-A New Antibiotic Stewardship Target?Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The effect of the antibiotic stewardship program (ASP) on community-acquired pneumonia (CAP): a before-after study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Identify Drug-Resistant Pathogens in Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia.Advances in respiratory medicine · 2023Review
- Characterization of antibiotic prescription in intensive care units according to the Access, Watch, and Reserve classification.Revista CuidarteArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCommunity-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is the most frequent infection diagnosis in hospitals. Antimicrobial therapy for CAP is depicted in clinical practice guidelines, but adherence data and effect of antibiotic stewardship measures are lacking.
methodsA dedicated antibiotic team pointed out CAP as a potential target for antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) measures at a 1.000-bed, tertiary care, teaching university hospital in Norway from March until May for the years 2016 throughout 2021. The aim of the AMS program was to increase diagnostic and antimicrobial therapy adherence to national clinical practice guideline recommendations through multiple and continuous AMS efforts. Descriptive statistics were retrospectively used to delineate antimicrobial therapy for CAP. The primary outcomes were proportions that received narrow-spectrum beta-lactams, and broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy.
results1.112 CAP episodes were identified. The annual proportion that received narrow-spectrum beta-lactams increased from 56.1 to 74.4% (p = 0.045). Correspondingly, the annual proportion that received broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy decreased from 34.1 to 17.1% (p = 0.002). Trends were affected by the coronavirus pandemic. Mortality and 30-day readmission rates remained unchanged. De-escalation strategies were frequently unutilized, and overall therapy duration exceeded clinical practice guideline recommendations substantially. Microbiologically confirmed CAP episodes increased from 33.7 to 56.2% during the study period.
conclusionCAP is a suitable model condition that is sensitive to AMS measures. A continuous focus on improved microbiological diagnostics and antimicrobial therapy initiation is efficient in increasing adherence to guideline recommendations. There is an unmet need for better antimicrobial de-escalation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.