Trial reportInternational journal of clinical oncology2022
Phase I/II study of nedaplatin and nab-paclitaxel for patients with previously untreated advanced squamous cell lung cancer: Kanto Respiratory Disease Study Group (KRSG) 1302.
Trial report in International journal of clinical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interactions of Nedaplatin with Nucleobases and Purine Alkaloids: Their Role in Cancer Therapy.Biomedicines · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNedaplatin and nab-paclitaxel are each efficacious in the treatment of squamous cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND
methodsEligibility criteria were: no prior chemotherapy, advanced squamous cell lung cancer; performance status 0-1, age > 20 years but < 75 years, and adequate hematologic, hepatic and renal function. Patients received escalating doses of nab-paclitaxel under a fixed dose of nedaplatin (100 mg/m
resultsIn phase I, three patients at level 1 experienced no dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and two patients at level 2 experienced DLTs. Level 1 was thus determined as the recommended dose. Twenty-three patients were enrolled in phase II. The 3 patients in level 1 and 23 patients in phase II were included together for analyses. Three of these 26 patients were excluded from response analysis due to pneumonia and patient refusal. Response rate was 91.3% (95% confidence interval, 72.0-98.9%). Toxicities observed during all cycles were tolerable.
conclusionsThe recommended dose for this combination was nedaplatin at 100 mg/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.