Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36241918›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2023

The preoperative Hounsfield unit value at the position of the future screw insertion is a better predictor of screw loosening than other methods.

Jingchi Li, Zhuang Zhang, Tianhang Xie, Zhetao Song, Yueming Song, Jiancheng Zeng

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Generation and validation of a Hounsfield unit (HU) threshold for predicting mechanical and junctional complications following thoracolumbar or lumbar fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Bone density-optimized pedicle screw planning enhances mechanical stability.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. MRI-based endplate bone quality scoring system in cervical OPLL: a novel measuring method predicting titanium mesh cage subsidence following ACCF.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The clinical impact of MRI-based vertebral bone quality score for assessment of bone quality.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jingchi LiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital/West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, 37# Wuhou Guoxue Road, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan Province, People's Republic of China.
Zhuang ZhangDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital/West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, 37# Wuhou Guoxue Road, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan Province, People's Republic of China.
Tianhang XieDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital/West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, 37# Wuhou Guoxue Road, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan Province, People's Republic of China.
Zhetao SongDepartment of Imaging, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Yueming SongDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital/West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, 37# Wuhou Guoxue Road, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan Province, People's Republic of China. sym_cd@163.com.
Jiancheng ZengDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital/West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, 37# Wuhou Guoxue Road, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan Province, People's Republic of China. tomzeng5@126.com.
Sichuan University · CN

Funding

Sichuan Science and Technology Major Program No. 15 2018SZDZX0013-3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveScrew loosening is a widely reported issue after spinal screw fixation and triggers several complications after lumbar interbody fusion. Osteoporosis is an essential risk factor for screw loosening. Hounsfield units (HU) value is a credible indicator during bone mineral density (BMD) evaluation. As compared with the general evaluation of BMD, we hypothesized that specific measurements of HU at the precise location of the future screw insertion may be a better predictor of screw loosening.

methodsClinical data of 56 patients treated by oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) of the L4-L5 segments with an anterior lateral single rod (ALSR) screw fixation were reviewed in this study. Vertebral bodies with ≥ 1 mm width radiolucent zones around the screw were defined as screw loosening. HU in the insertional screw positions, the central transverse plane, and the average values of three and four planes were measured. Regression analyses identified independent risk factors for screw loosening separately. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was computed to evaluate predictive performance.

resultsThe local HU values were significantly lower in the loosening group, regardless of the selected measuring methods. The AUC of screw loosening prediction was higher in the insertional screw positions' HU than other frequently used methods.

conclusionsThe HU value measured in the insertional screw position is a better predictor of ALSR screw loosening than other methods. The risk of screw loosening should be reduced by optimizing the trajectory of the screw based on the measurement of HU in preoperative CT. KEY POINTS: • Osteoporosis is an essential risk factor for screw loosening, and Hounsfield units (HU) are a credible predictor during bone mineral density (BMD) evaluation. • The HU value measured in the insertional screw position is a better predictor of screw loosening than other frequently used HU measurement methods. • The risk of screw loosening might potentially be reduced by optimizing the trajectory of the screw based on the measurement of HU in preoperative CT.

Indexed as

OsteoporosisSpinal FusionBone DensityBone ScrewsHumansLumbar VertebraeRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedBone densityBone screwsInternal fixatorsSpinal fusionX-ray computed tomography

Identifiers

PMID36241918
PMCPMC9935714
OpenAlexW4306179743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.