Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36241769›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2022

Bacteria-on-a-bead: probing the hydrodynamic interplay of dynamic cell appendages during cell separation.

Nora Sauter, Matteo Sangermani, Isabelle Hug, Urs Jenal, Thomas Pfohl

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 52% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Nora Sauter *Institute of Physics, University of Freiburg, 79104, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7387-8274
Matteo Sangermani *Biozentrum, University of Basel, 4056, Basel, Switzerland.
Isabelle HugBiozentrum, University of Basel, 4056, Basel, Switzerland.
Urs JenalBiozentrum, University of Basel, 4056, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1637-3376
Thomas PfohlInstitute of Physics, University of Freiburg, 79104, Freiburg, Germany. thomas.pfohl@physik.uni-freiburg.de.ORCID 0000-0002-7879-5216
University of Basel · CHUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surface attachment of bacteria is the first step of biofilm formation and is often mediated and coordinated by the extracellular appendages, flagellum and pili. The model organism Caulobacter crescentus undergoes an asymmetric division cycle, giving rise to a motile "swarmer cell" and a sessile "stalked cell", which is attached to the surface. In the highly polarized predivisional cell, pili and flagellum, which are assembled at the pole opposite the stalk, are both activated before and during the process of cell separation. We explored the interplay of flagellum and active pili by growing predivisional cells on colloidal beads, creating a bacteria-on-a-bead system. Using this set-up, we were able to simultaneously visualize the bacterial motility and analyze the dynamics of the flagellum and pili during cell separation. The observed activities of flagellum and pili at the new cell pole of the predivisional cell result in a cooperating interplay of the appendages during approaching and attaching to a surface. Even in presence of a functioning flagellum, pili are capable of surface attachment and keeping the cell in position. Moreover, while flagellar rotation decreases the average attachment time of a single pilus, it increases the overall attachment rate of pili in a synergetic manner.

Indexed as

Caulobacter crescentusHydrodynamicsCell SeparationFimbriae, BacterialFlagella

Identifiers

PMID36241769
PMCPMC9568603
OpenAlexW4306168676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.