Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36241670›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Diagnostic performance of convolutional neural networks for dental sexual dimorphism.

Ademir Franco, Lucas Porto, Dennis Heng, Jared Murray, Anna Lygate, Raquel Franco, Juliano Bueno, Marilia Sobania, Márcio M Costa, Luiz R Paranhos and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Teeth Microcracks Research: Towards Multi-Modal Imaging.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  18. Artificial intelligence in forensic medicine and forensic dentistry.The Journal of forensic odonto-stomatology · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ademir FrancoCentre of Forensic and Legal Medicine and Dentistry, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Lucas PortoComputer Vision Solutions, Rumina S.A, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Dennis HengCentre of Forensic and Legal Medicine and Dentistry, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Jared MurrayCentre of Forensic and Legal Medicine and Dentistry, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Anna LygateCentre of Forensic and Legal Medicine and Dentistry, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Raquel FrancoDepartment of Preventive and Social Dentistry, Federal University of Uberlandia, Av. Pará 1720, Bloco 2G, Sala 1, Campus Umuarama, Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Juliano BuenoDivision of Oral Radiology, Faculdade Sao Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, Brazil.
Marilia SobaniaDivision of Forensic Dentistry, Faculdade Sao Leopoldo Mandic, Campinas, Brazil.
Márcio M CostaDepartment of Removable Prosthodontics, Federal University of Uberlandia, Uberlândia, Brazil.
Luiz R ParanhosDepartment of Preventive and Social Dentistry, Federal University of Uberlandia, Av. Pará 1720, Bloco 2G, Sala 1, Campus Umuarama, Uberlândia, Minas Gerais, Brazil. paranhos.lrp@gmail.com.
Scheila ManicaCentre of Forensic and Legal Medicine and Dentistry, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
André AbadeComputer Science, Federal Institute of Science and Technology, Barra do Garças, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Convolutional neural networks (CNN) led to important solutions in the field of Computer Vision. More recently, forensic sciences benefited from the resources of artificial intelligence, especially in procedures that normally require operator-dependent steps. Forensic tools for sexual dimorphism based on morphological dental traits are available but have limited performance. This study aimed to test the application of a machine learning setup to distinguish females and males using dentomaxillofacial features from a radiographic dataset. The sample consisted of panoramic radiographs (n = 4003) of individuals in the age interval of 6 and 22.9 years. Image annotation was performed with V7 software (V7labs, London, UK). From Scratch (FS) and Transfer Learning (TL) CNN architectures were compared, and diagnostic accuracy tests were used. TL (82%) performed better than FS (71%). The correct classifications of females and males aged ≥ 15 years were 87% and 84%, respectively. For females and males < 15 years, the correct classifications were 80% and 83%, respectively. The Area Under the Curve (AUC) from Receiver-operating Characteristic (ROC) curves showed high classification accuracy between 0.87 and 0.91. The radio-diagnostic use of CNN for sexual dimorphism showed positive outcomes and promising forensic applications to the field of dental human identification.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceSex CharacteristicsArea Under CurveFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleNeural Networks, ComputerROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID36241670
PMCPMC9568558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.