Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36241377›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice2024

Development of a quality assessment tool for pharmacy and therapeutics committees and subsequent pilot testing.

Nicole Schönenberger, Carla Meyer-Massetti, Silvina Bravo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nicole SchönenbergerDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, University Hospital of Bern - Inselspital Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Carla Meyer-MassettiDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, University Hospital of Bern - Inselspital Bern, Bern, Switzerland carla.meyer-massetti@extern.insel.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-3523-5729
Silvina BravoUniversity Hospital of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pharmacy and therapeutics committees (PTCs) are multidisciplinary hospital teams responsible for rational medication use. We aimed at developing and piloting an assessment tool for their operating quality.We conducted a scoping literature review in PubMed and Embase to identify potential assessment items. Their relevance was systematically rated and consolidated into the final tool.60 relevant items were included, grouped into eight focus topics: the committee's institutional integration, member characteristics, performance indicators, meeting structure, formulary decision-making and characteristics, strategies to guide medication use and medication use evaluations.In combination with a SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats) analysis, the tool helped the identification of improvement opportunities for a pilot hospital: adapting the committee's structure, improving the formulary decision-making, implementing strategies to guide formulary medication use and strengthening the committee's recognition within the institution.The tool successfully identified improvement opportunities for a PTC and could therefore be interesting for other hospitals.

Indexed as

PharmacyPharmacy Service, HospitalHospitalsPharmacy and Therapeutics CommitteeHealth Care Economics and OrganizationsMEDICATION SYSTEMS, HOSPITALPHARMACY SERVICE, HOSPITALPractice GuidelineQuality Assurance, Health CareQuality of Health CareSafety

Identifiers

PMID36241377
PMCPMC10895181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.