Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36241249›Full record

ArticleBeijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences2022

[Efficacy of plasma exchange in severe crescentic IgA nephropathy: A multicentered, cohort study].

Z Wang, J J Zhang, L Zuo, Y Wang, W G Li, H Cheng, G Y Cai, H Y Pei, L H Wang, X J Zhou and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Targeting complement in IgA nephropathy.Clinical kidney journal · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Z WangRenal Division, Peking University First Hospital; Institute of Nephrology, Peking University; Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China; Key Laboratory of CKD Prevention and Treatment, Ministry of Education of China, Research Units of Diagnosis and Treatment of lmmune-Mediated Kidney Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100191, China.
J J ZhangDepartment of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, China.
L ZuoDepartment of Nephrology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China.
Y WangDepartment of Nephrology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China.
W G LiDepartment of Nephrology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China.
H ChengDivision of Nephrology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 10029, China.
G Y CaiDepartment of Nephrology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China.
H Y PeiRenal Division, Department of Medicine, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050000, China.
L H WangRenal Division, Shanxi Medical University Second Affiliated Hospital, Taiyuan 030001, China.
X J ZhouRenal Division, Peking University First Hospital; Institute of Nephrology, Peking University; Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China; Key Laboratory of CKD Prevention and Treatment, Ministry of Education of China, Research Units of Diagnosis and Treatment of lmmune-Mediated Kidney Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100191, China.
S F ShiRenal Division, Peking University First Hospital; Institute of Nephrology, Peking University; Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China; Key Laboratory of CKD Prevention and Treatment, Ministry of Education of China, Research Units of Diagnosis and Treatment of lmmune-Mediated Kidney Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100191, China.
L J LiuRenal Division, Peking University First Hospital; Institute of Nephrology, Peking University; Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China; Key Laboratory of CKD Prevention and Treatment, Ministry of Education of China, Research Units of Diagnosis and Treatment of lmmune-Mediated Kidney Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100191, China.
J C LvRenal Division, Peking University First Hospital; Institute of Nephrology, Peking University; Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China; Key Laboratory of CKD Prevention and Treatment, Ministry of Education of China, Research Units of Diagnosis and Treatment of lmmune-Mediated Kidney Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100191, China.
H ZhangRenal Division, Peking University First Hospital; Institute of Nephrology, Peking University; Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China; Key Laboratory of CKD Prevention and Treatment, Ministry of Education of China, Research Units of Diagnosis and Treatment of lmmune-Mediated Kidney Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100191, China.
China-Japan Friendship Hospital · CNChinese PLA General Hospital · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University · CNPeking University · CNPeking University Third Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of plasma exchange therapy on crescentic IgA nephropathy (IgAN).

methodsA retrospective analysis was performed in a cohort of patients with crescentic IgAN from January 2012 to September 2020 at 9 sites across China. Clinical and pathological data, as well as therapeutic regimens, were collected. In order to minimize the effect of potential confounders in baseline characteristics, propensity score matching using a 1 ∶1 ratio nearest neighbor algorithm was performed between the adjunctive plasma exchange therapy group and the intensive immunosuppressive therapy group. The primary outcome was end-stage of kidney disease (ESKD). Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare the difference in renal survival between the two groups.

resultsA total of 95 crescentic IgAN patients with acute kidney disease were included in this study, including 37 (38.9%) patients receiving adjunctive plasma exchange therapy, and 58 (61.1%) patients receiving intensive immunosuppressive therapy. In the whole cohort, the baseline eGFR was 12.77 (7.28, 21.29) mL/(min·1.73 m

conclusionThe adjunctive plasma exchange therapy in addition to conventional intense immunosuppressive therapy did not additionally improve the prognosis of crescentic IgA nephropathy.

Indexed as

Glomerulonephritis, IGAKidney Failure, ChronicCohort StudiesHumansPlasma ExchangePrognosisRetrospective StudiesSteroidsSteroidsCrescentic glomerulonephritisGlomerulonephritisIgA nephropathyPlasma exchange therapy

Identifiers

PMID36241249
PMCPMC9568402
OpenAlexW4306316587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.