SynthesisAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2023
American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association blood pressure categories-a systematic review of the relationship with adverse pregnancy outcomes in the first half of pregnancy.
Synthesis in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Blood pressure-lowering treatment for pregnant women with non-severe hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2025Pooled it
- Blood Pressure and Heart Rate Variability and the Impact on Pregnancy Outcomes: A Systematic Review.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Pooled it
- Perinatal Outcomes Associated With Management of Stage 1 Hypertension.Obstetrics and gynecology · 2023Trial
- Perceived social support and antenatal blood pressure in pregnant women at risk for hypertensive disorders.Journal of behavioral medicine · 2026Article
- Pregnancy adverse outcomes associated with change of blood pressure categories in early pregnancy among women with normotension: a retrospective cohort study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Modelling lowering of raised blood pressure in pregnancy to reduce pre-eclampsia: secondary analysis of data from prospective cohort studies.BMJ medicine · 2026Article
- Elevated Pre-Pregnancy Blood Pressure and the Risk of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: Evidence From a Nationwide Population-Based Study.Journal of Korean medical science · 2025Article
- Blood Pressure Variability and Adverse Pregnancy and Cardiovascular Outcomes in the ALSPAC Cohort.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- American Heart Association blood pressure classification and subsequent risk of preeclampsia.Pregnancy (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Blood Pressure Thresholds for Hypertension in Pregnancy and Future Cardiovascular Risk.Mayo Clinic proceedings · 2025Article
- Do lower antenatal blood pressure cut-offs in pregnant women with obesity identify those at greater risk of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes? A secondary analysis of data from the UK Pregnancies Better Eating and Activity Trial (UPBEAT).International journal of obesity (2005) · 2025Article
- Early pregnancy triglycerides and blood pressure: a combined predictor for preeclampsia.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- The association between 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guideline for hypertension and neonatal outcomes in Kenya: a retrospective study.Tropical medicine and health · 2025Article
- Impact of stage 1 hypertension before 20 gestational weeks on pregnancy outcomes in twin pregnancies: a retrospective cohort study.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2025Article
- Hypertension in Pregnancy and Postpartum: Current Standards and Opportunities to Improve Care.Circulation · 2025Review
- Diagnostic properties of differing BP thresholds for adverse pregnancy outcomes in standard-risk nulliparous women: A secondary analysis of SCOPE cohort data.PLoS medicine · 2025Article
- Does the implementation of revised American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guidelines improve the identification of stillbirths and preterm births in hypertensive pregnancies: a population-based cohort study from South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Article
- Blood pressure measurement and adverse pregnancy outcomes: A cohort study testing blood pressure variability and alternatives to 140/90 mmHg.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2024Observational
- Pregnancy Outcomes in Females with Stage 1 Hypertension and Elevated Blood Pressure Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveA relationship between the 2017 American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association blood pressure thresholds and adverse pregnancy outcomes has been reported, but few studies have explored the diagnostic test properties of these cutoffs. DATA SOURCES: We systematically searched electronic databases (from 2017 to 2021) for reports of blood pressure measurements in pregnancy, classified according to 2017 American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association criteria, and their relationship with pregnancy outcomes. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies recording blood pressure at <20 weeks gestation were included.
methodsMeta-analyses were used to investigate the strength of the association between blood pressure cutoffs and adverse outcomes, and the diagnostic test properties were calculated.
resultsOf 23 studies included, there was a stepwise relationship between the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association blood pressure category (when compared with normal blood pressure of <120/80 mmHg) and the strength of the association with preeclampsia. The category of elevated blood pressure had a risk ratio of 2.0 (95% prediction interval, 0.8-4.8), the stage 1 hypertension category had a risk ratio of 3.0 (95% prediction interval, 1.1-8.5), and the stage 2 hypertension category had a risk ratio of 7.9 (95% prediction interval, 1.8-35.1). Between-study variability was related to the magnitude of the association with stronger relationships in larger studies at low risk of bias and with unselected populations with multiple routine blood pressure measurements. None of the systolic blood pressure measurements of <120 mmHg, <130/80 mmHg, or <140/90 mmHg were useful to rule out the development of preeclampsia (all negative likelihood ratios >0.2). Only a blood pressure measurement of ≥140/90 mmHg was a good predictor for the development of preeclampsia (positive likelihood ratio, 5.95). The findings were similar for other outcomes.
conclusionAlthough a blood pressure of 120 to 140 over 80 to 90 mmHg at <20 weeks gestation is associated with a heightened risk for preeclampsia and adverse pregnancy outcomes and may assist in risk prediction in multivariable modelling, lowering the diagnostic threshold for chronic hypertension would not assist clinicians in identifying women at heightened risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.