Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36241079›Full record

SynthesisAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2023

American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association blood pressure categories-a systematic review of the relationship with adverse pregnancy outcomes in the first half of pregnancy.

Laura J Slade, Hiten D Mistry, Jeffrey N Bone, Milly Wilson, Maya Blackman, Nuhaat Syeda, Peter von Dadelszen, Laura A Magee

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Blood pressure-lowering treatment for pregnant women with non-severe hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Impact of stage 1 hypertension before 20 gestational weeks on pregnancy outcomes in twin pregnancies: a retrospective cohort study.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Laura J SladeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Women's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.
Hiten D MistryDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course and Population Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Jeffrey N BoneBritish Columbia Children's Hospital Research Institute, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Milly WilsonDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course and Population Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Maya BlackmanDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course and Population Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Nuhaat SyedaDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course and Population Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Peter von DadelszenDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course and Population Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Laura A MageeDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course and Population Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: Laura.A.Magee@kcl.ac.uk.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P027938/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveA relationship between the 2017 American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association blood pressure thresholds and adverse pregnancy outcomes has been reported, but few studies have explored the diagnostic test properties of these cutoffs. DATA SOURCES: We systematically searched electronic databases (from 2017 to 2021) for reports of blood pressure measurements in pregnancy, classified according to 2017 American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association criteria, and their relationship with pregnancy outcomes. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies recording blood pressure at <20 weeks gestation were included.

methodsMeta-analyses were used to investigate the strength of the association between blood pressure cutoffs and adverse outcomes, and the diagnostic test properties were calculated.

resultsOf 23 studies included, there was a stepwise relationship between the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association blood pressure category (when compared with normal blood pressure of <120/80 mmHg) and the strength of the association with preeclampsia. The category of elevated blood pressure had a risk ratio of 2.0 (95% prediction interval, 0.8-4.8), the stage 1 hypertension category had a risk ratio of 3.0 (95% prediction interval, 1.1-8.5), and the stage 2 hypertension category had a risk ratio of 7.9 (95% prediction interval, 1.8-35.1). Between-study variability was related to the magnitude of the association with stronger relationships in larger studies at low risk of bias and with unselected populations with multiple routine blood pressure measurements. None of the systolic blood pressure measurements of <120 mmHg, <130/80 mmHg, or <140/90 mmHg were useful to rule out the development of preeclampsia (all negative likelihood ratios >0.2). Only a blood pressure measurement of ≥140/90 mmHg was a good predictor for the development of preeclampsia (positive likelihood ratio, 5.95). The findings were similar for other outcomes.

conclusionAlthough a blood pressure of 120 to 140 over 80 to 90 mmHg at <20 weeks gestation is associated with a heightened risk for preeclampsia and adverse pregnancy outcomes and may assist in risk prediction in multivariable modelling, lowering the diagnostic threshold for chronic hypertension would not assist clinicians in identifying women at heightened risk.

Indexed as

CardiologyHypertensionPre-EclampsiaAmerican Heart AssociationBlood PressureFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeUnited Statescardiovascular systematic reviewchronic hypertension in pregnancypreeclampsiapregnancy complicationspregnancy-induced hypertension

Identifiers

PMID36241079
PMCPMC10239058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.