Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36240776›Full record

ArticleStem cell reports2023

Entropy sorting of single-cell RNA sequencing data reveals the inner cell mass in the human pre-implantation embryo.

Arthur Radley, Elena Corujo-Simon, Jennifer Nichols, Austin Smith, Sara-Jane Dunn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cell reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Pluripotent cell states and fates in human embryo models.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Propagating pluripotency - The conundrum of self-renewal.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Arthur RadleyWellcome-MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Jeffrey Cheah Biomedical Centre, Puddicombe Way, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge CB2 0AW, UK.
Elena Corujo-SimonMRC Human Genetics Unit, MRC Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK.
Jennifer NicholsMRC Human Genetics Unit, MRC Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK.
Austin SmithLiving Systems Institute, University of Exeter, Stocker Road, Exeter EX4 4QD, UK. Electronic address: austin.smith@exeter.ac.uk.
Sara-Jane DunnMicrosoft Research, 21 Station Road, Cambridge CB1 2FB, UK. Electronic address: sjdunn@deepmind.com.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council 1943266Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P021573/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/T007044/2Medical Research Council G1100526Medical Research Council G1100526/1Medical Research Council MR/P00072X/2Medical Research Council MR/P010423/1Medical Research Council MR/W025310/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A major challenge in single-cell gene expression analysis is to discern meaningful cellular heterogeneity from technical or biological noise. To address this challenge, we present entropy sorting (ES), a mathematical framework that distinguishes genes indicative of cell identity. ES achieves this in an unsupervised manner by quantifying if observed correlations between features are more likely to have occurred due to random chance versus a dependent relationship, without the need for any user-defined significance threshold. On synthetic data, we demonstrate the removal of noisy signals to reveal a higher resolution of gene expression patterns than commonly used feature selection methods. We then apply ES to human pre-implantation embryo single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data. Previous studies failed to unambiguously identify early inner cell mass (ICM), suggesting that the human embryo may diverge from the mouse paradigm. In contrast, ES resolves the ICM and reveals sequential lineage bifurcations as in the classical model. ES thus provides a powerful approach for maximizing information extraction from high-dimensional datasets such as scRNA-seq data.

Indexed as

BlastocystEmbryonic DevelopmentAnimalsEmbryo, MammalianEntropyGene Expression ProfilingHumansMiceSequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell Analysisfeature selectionhuman embryo inner cell masssingle-cell RNA sequencing

Identifiers

PMID36240776
PMCPMC9859930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.