Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36240525›Full record

ArticleBreast (Edinburgh, Scotland)2022

Imaging of lumpectomy surface with large field-of-view confocal laser scanning microscope for intraoperative margin assessment - POLARHIS study.

Mariana-Felicia Sandor, Beatrice Schwalbach, Viktoria Hofmann, Simona-Elena Istrate, Zlatna Schuller, Elena Ionescu, Sara Heimann, Moira Ragazzi, Michael P Lux

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Current role of HistologPathologica · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Accuracy of Ex-vivo Fluorescence Confocal Microscopy in Margin Assessment of Solid Tumors: A Systematic Review.The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Breast tissue imaging atlas using ultra-fast confocal microscopy to identify cancer lesions.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mariana-Felicia SandorDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Women's Hospital St. Louise, Paderborn, Women's Hospital, St. Josefs, Salzkotten, St. Vincenz-Krankenhaus GmbH, Husener Str. 81, 33098, Paderborn, Germany.
Beatrice SchwalbachDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Women's Hospital St. Louise, Paderborn, Women's Hospital, St. Josefs, Salzkotten, St. Vincenz-Krankenhaus GmbH, Husener Str. 81, 33098, Paderborn, Germany.
Viktoria HofmannDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Women's Hospital St. Louise, Paderborn, Women's Hospital, St. Josefs, Salzkotten, St. Vincenz-Krankenhaus GmbH, Husener Str. 81, 33098, Paderborn, Germany.
Simona-Elena IstrateDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Women's Hospital St. Louise, Paderborn, Women's Hospital, St. Josefs, Salzkotten, St. Vincenz-Krankenhaus GmbH, Husener Str. 81, 33098, Paderborn, Germany.
Zlatna SchullerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Women's Hospital St. Louise, Paderborn, Women's Hospital, St. Josefs, Salzkotten, St. Vincenz-Krankenhaus GmbH, Husener Str. 81, 33098, Paderborn, Germany.
Elena IonescuDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Women's Hospital St. Louise, Paderborn, Women's Hospital, St. Josefs, Salzkotten, St. Vincenz-Krankenhaus GmbH, Husener Str. 81, 33098, Paderborn, Germany.
Sara HeimannDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Women's Hospital St. Louise, Paderborn, Women's Hospital, St. Josefs, Salzkotten, St. Vincenz-Krankenhaus GmbH, Husener Str. 81, 33098, Paderborn, Germany.
Moira RagazziPathology Unit, Azienda USL - IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42123, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Michael P LuxDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Women's Hospital St. Louise, Paderborn, Women's Hospital, St. Josefs, Salzkotten, St. Vincenz-Krankenhaus GmbH, Husener Str. 81, 33098, Paderborn, Germany. Electronic address: m.lux@vincenz.de.
Brüderkrankenhaus St. Josef Paderborn · DEAzienda Sanitaria Unità Locale di Reggio Emilia · ITSt. Vincenz-Krankenhaus Limburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBreast-conserving surgery (BCS) in case of breast cancer and/or in-situ-carcinoma lesions (DCIS) intends to completely remove breast cancer while saving healthy tissue as much as possible to achieve better aesthetic and psychological outcomes for the patient. Such modality should result in postoperative tumor-free margins of the surgical resection in order to carry on with the next therapeutical steps of the patient care. However, 10-40% of patients undergo more than one procedure to achieve acceptable cancer-negative margins. A 2nd operation or further operation (re-operation) has physical, psychological, and economic consequences. It also delays the administration of adjuvant therapy, and has been associated with an elevated risk of local and distant disease relapse. In addition, a high re-operation rate can have significant economic effects - both for the service provider and for the payer. A more efficient intraoperative assessment of the margin may address these issues. Recently, a large field-of-view confocal laser scanning microscope designed to allow real-time intraoperative margin assessment has arrived on the market - the Histolog Scanner. In this paper, we present the first evaluation of lumpectomy margins assessment with this new device. MATERIALS AND

methods40 consecutive patients undergoing BCS with invasive and/or DCIS were included. The whole surface of the surgical specimens was imaged right after the operation using the Histolog Scanner (HLS). The assessment of all the specimen margins was performed intraoperatively according to the standard-of-care of the center which consists of combined ultrasound (IOUS) and/or conventional specimen radiography (CSR), and gross surgical inspection. Margin assessment on HLS images was blindly performed after the surgery by 5 surgeons and one pathologist. The capabilities to correctly determine margin status in HLS images was compared to the final histopathological assessment. Furthermore, the potential reduction of positive-margin and re-operation rates by utilization of the HLS were extrapolated.

resultsThe study population included 7/40 patients with DCIS (17.5%), 17/40 patients with DCIS and invasive ductal cancer (IDC NST) (42.5%), 10/40 patients with IDC NST (25%), 4/40 with invasive lobular cancer (ILC) (10%), and 1/40 patients with a mix of IDC NST, DCIS, and ILC. Clinical routine resulted in 13 patients with positive margins identified by final histopathological assessment, resulting in 12 re-operations (30% re-operation rate). Amongst these 12 patients, 10 had DCIS components involved in their margin, confirming the importance of improving the detection accuracy of this specific lesion. Surgeons, who were given a short familiarization on HLS images, and a pathologist were able to detect positive margins in 4/12 and 7/12 patients (33% and 58%), respectively, that were missed by the intraoperative standard of care. In addition, a retrospective analysis of the HLS images revealed that cancer lesions can be identified in 9/12 (75%) patients with positive margins.

conclusionThe present study presents that breast cancer can be detected by surgeons and pathologists in HLS images of lumpectomy margins leading to a potential reduction of 30% and 75% of the re-operations. The Histolog Scanner is easily inserted into the clinical workflow and has the potential to improve the intraoperative standard-of-care for the assessment of breast conserving treatments. In addition, it has the potential to increase oncological safety and cosmetics by avoiding subsequent resections and can also have a significant positive economic effect for service providers and cost bearers. The data presented in this study will have to be further confirmed in a prospective phase-III-trial.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingFemaleHumansLasersMargins of ExcisionMastectomy, SegmentalNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProspective StudiesReoperationRetrospective StudiesBreast conserving surgeryConfocal microscopyDuctal carcinoma in-situFresh tissue imagingHistolog scannerRe-excision

Identifiers

PMID36240525
PMCPMC9574757
OpenAlexW4301594917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.