Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36240248›Full record

Observational studyPLoS neglected tropical diseases2022

Impact of antivenom administration on the evolution of cutaneous lesions in loxoscelism: A prospective observational study.

Ceila M S Malaque, Christina T G Novaes, Roberta O Piorelli, Jose Y Risk, Jefferson C Murad, Amanda N Lara, Cristiana C Virgulino, Karina T Miyaji, Marcelo L Santoro

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. An overview of spider accidents in the Brazilian Amazon.The journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ceila M S MalaqueHospital Vital Brazil, Instituto Butantan, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9328-7925
Christina T G NovaesHospital Vital Brazil, Instituto Butantan, São Paulo, Brazil.
Roberta O PiorelliHospital Vital Brazil, Instituto Butantan, São Paulo, Brazil.
Jose Y RiskHospital Vital Brazil, Instituto Butantan, São Paulo, Brazil.
Jefferson C MuradHospital Vital Brazil, Instituto Butantan, São Paulo, Brazil.
Amanda N LaraHospital Vital Brazil, Instituto Butantan, São Paulo, Brazil.
Cristiana C VirgulinoHospital Vital Brazil, Instituto Butantan, São Paulo, Brazil.
Karina T MiyajiDepartamento de Moléstias Infecciosas e Parasitárias, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marcelo L SantoroLaboratório de Fisiopatologia, Instituto Butantan, São Paulo, Brazil.
Instituto Butantan · BRHospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpiders of the genus Loxosceles are distributed throughout tropical and temperate regions worldwide. Loxosceles spp. bites may evolve to necrosis, with or without intravascular hemolysis. There is no consensus regarding the best treatment to prevent necrosis. The objective of this study was to evaluate the factors associated with the development of necrosis and the impact that antivenom administration has on the evolution of cutaneous loxoscelism. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsThis was a prospective observational study carried out at a referral center for envenoming. Over a 6-year period, we included 146 patients with a presumptive or definitive diagnosis of loxoscelism. Depending on the symptom severity, a polyvalent anti-arachnid antivenom was administered or not-in 74 cases (50.7%) and 72 cases (49.3%), respectively. Cutaneous and systemic manifestations were assessed at admission and weekly thereafter. Adverse reactions to the antivenom were also evaluated. Cutaneous loxoscelism was observed in 141 cases (96.6%), and the spider was identified in 29 (19.9%). The mean time from bite to antivenom administration was 41.6 ± 27.4 h. After discharge, 130 patients (90.9%) were treated with corticosteroids, antihistamines and analgesics being prescribed as needed. The probability of developing necrosis was significantly lower among the patients who were admitted earlier, as well as among those who received antivenom (p = 0.0245). Among the 74 patients receiving antivenom, early and delayed adverse reactions occurred in seven (9.5%) and four (5.4%), respectively. Local infection was observed only in three (2.3%) of the 128 patients for whom that information was available. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Necrosis after a Loxosceles sp. bite appears to more common when hospital admission is delayed or when antivenom is not administered. In addition, the administration of a polyvalent anti-arachnid antivenom appears to be safe, with a relatively low rate of adverse reactions.

Indexed as

Spider BitesSpidersSpider VenomsAnimalsAntiveninsHospitalizationHumansNecrosisProspective StudiesAntiveninsSpider Venoms

Identifiers

PMID36240248
PMCPMC9604982
OpenAlexW4306248125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.