Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36240206›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Soluble chitosan derivative treats wound infections and promotes wound healing in a novel MRSA-infected porcine partial-thickness burn wound model.

Francesco Egro, Alex Repko, Vidya Narayanaswamy, Asim Ejaz, Deokyeol Kim, M Asher Schusterman, Allister Loughran, Ali Ayyash, Stacy M Towsend, Shenda Baker and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Francesco EgroDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
Alex RepkoDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
Vidya NarayanaswamySynedgen Inc., Claremont, CA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8194-3371
Asim EjazDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
Deokyeol KimDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
M Asher SchustermanDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
Allister LoughranSynedgen Inc., Claremont, CA, United States of America.
Ali AyyashDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
Stacy M TowsendSynedgen Inc., Claremont, CA, United States of America.
Shenda BakerSynedgen Inc., Claremont, CA, United States of America.
Jenny ZiembickiDepartment of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Mercy, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
Kacey MarraDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
Peter RubinDepartment of Plastic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1148-6205
University of Pittsburgh · USSynedgen (United States) · USUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Burns are physically debilitating and potentially fatal injuries. The most common etiology of burn wound infections in the US is methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), which is particularly recalcitrant when biofilms form. The current standard of care, silver sulfadiazine (SSD) is effective in reducing bacterial load, but less effective in improving burn wound healing. New treatments that can manage infection while simultaneously improving healing would provide a benefit in the treatment of burns. Porcine models are frequently used as a model for human wound healing but can be expensive due to the need to separate wounds to avoid cross contamination. The porcine model developed in this study offers the capability to study multiple partial thickness burn wound (PTBW) sites on a single animal with minimal crosstalk to study wound healing, infection, and inflammation. The current study evaluates a wound rinse and a wound gel formulated with a non-toxic, polycationic chitosan derivative that is hypothesized to manage infection while also promoting healing, providing a potential alternate to SSD. Studies in vitro and in this PTBW porcine model compare treatment with the chitosan derivative formulations to SSD. The wound rinse and wound gel are observed to disrupt mature MRSA biofilms in vitro and reduce the MRSA load in vivo when compared to that of the standard of care. In vivo data further show increased re-epithelialization and faster healing in burns treated with wound rinse/gel as compared to SSD. Taken together, the data demonstrate the potential of the wound rinse/gel to significantly enhance healing, promote re-epithelialization, and reduce bacterial burden in infected PTBW using an economical porcine model.

Indexed as

BurnsChitosanMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusSoft Tissue InjuriesWound InfectionAnimalsHumansSilver SulfadiazineSwineWound HealingChitosanSilver Sulfadiazine

Identifiers

PMID36240206
PMCPMC9565743
OpenAlexW4306194487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.