Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36239934›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2022

Estimated Protection of Prior SARS-CoV-2 Infection Against Reinfection With the Omicron Variant Among Messenger RNA-Vaccinated and Nonvaccinated Individuals in Quebec, Canada.

Sara Carazo, Danuta M Skowronski, Marc Brisson, Chantal Sauvageau, Nicholas Brousseau, Rodica Gilca, Manale Ouakki, Sapha Barkati, Judith Fafard, Denis Talbot and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Sara CarazoBiological Risks Unit, Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Danuta M SkowronskiCommunicable Diseases and Immunization Services, British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Marc BrissonCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Chantal SauvageauBiological Risks Unit, Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Nicholas BrousseauBiological Risks Unit, Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Rodica GilcaBiological Risks Unit, Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Manale OuakkiBiological Risks Unit, Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Sapha BarkatiDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Center, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Judith FafardLaboratoire de Santé Publique du Québec, Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, Quebec, Canada.
Denis TalbotCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Vladimir GilcaBiological Risks Unit, Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Geneviève DeceuninckCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Christophe GarencBiological Risks Unit, Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Alex CarignanDepartment of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Sherbrook University, Sherbrook, Quebec, Canada.
Philippe De WalsBiological Risks Unit, Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Gaston De SerresBiological Risks Unit, Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: The Omicron variant is phylogenetically and antigenically distinct from earlier SARS-CoV-2 variants and the original vaccine strain. Protection conferred by prior SARS-CoV-2 infection against Omicron reinfection, with and without vaccination, requires quantification. Objective: To estimate the protection against Omicron reinfection and hospitalization conferred by prior heterologous non-Omicron SARS-CoV-2 infection and/or up to 3 doses of an ancestral, Wuhan-like messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine. Design, Setting, and Participants: This test-negative, population-based case-control study was conducted between December 26, 2021, and March 12, 2022, and included community-dwelling individuals aged 12 years or older who were tested for SARS-CoV-2 infection in the province of Quebec, Canada. Exposures: Prior laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection with or without mRNA vaccination. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 reinfection and associated hospitalization, presumed to be associated with the Omicron variant according to genomic surveillance. The odds of prior infection with or without vaccination were compared for case participants with Omicron infection and associated hospitalizations vs test-negative control participants. Estimated protection was derived as 1 - the odds ratio, adjusted for age, sex, testing indication, and epidemiologic week. Analyses were stratified by severity and time since last non-Omicron infection or vaccine dose. Results: This study included 696 439 individuals (224 007 case participants and 472 432 control participants); 62.2% and 63.9% were female and 87.4% and 75.5% were aged 18 to 69 years, respectively. Prior non-Omicron SARS-CoV-2 infection was detected for 9505 case participants (4.2%) and 29 712 control participants (6.3%). Among nonvaccinated individuals, prior non-Omicron infection was associated with a 44% reduction (95% CI, 38%-48%) in Omicron reinfection risk, which decreased from 66% (95% CI, 57%-73%) at 3 to 5 months to 35% (95% CI, 21%-47%) at 9 to 11 months postinfection and was below 30% thereafter. The more severe the prior infection, the greater the risk reduction. Estimated protection (95% CI) against Omicron infection was consistently significantly higher among vaccinated individuals with prior infection compared with vaccinated infection-naive individuals, with 65% (63%-67%) vs 20% (16%-24%) for 1 dose, 68% (67%-70%) vs 42% (41%-44%) for 2 doses, and 83% (81%-84%) vs 73% (72%-73%) for 3 doses. For individuals with prior infection, estimated protection (95% CI) against Omicron-associated hospitalization was 81% (66%-89%) and increased to 86% (77%-99%) with 1, 94% (91%-96%) with 2, and 97% (94%-99%) with 3 mRNA vaccine doses, without signs of waning. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this study suggest that vaccination with 2 or 3 mRNA vaccine doses among individuals with prior heterologous SARS-CoV-2 infection provided the greatest protection against Omicron-associated hospitalization. In the context of program goals to prevent severe outcomes and preserve health care system capacity, a third mRNA vaccine dose may add limited protection in twice-vaccinated individuals with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Indexed as

COVID-19Viral VaccinesCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMalemRNA VaccinesQuebecReinfectionRNA, MessengerSARS-CoV-2Vaccines, SyntheticmRNA VaccinesRNA, MessengerVaccines, SyntheticViral Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID36239934
PMCPMC9568797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.