Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36239932›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England2023

Use of radiological information system data in Clinical Portal database to screen for missed abdominal aortic aneurysms.

C Lu, A C Gordon, P Murphy, L Sicely, S Aiono

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. To challenge, to evolve and to vary.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

C LuWhanganui District Health Board, New Zealand.
A C GordonWhanganui District Health Board, New Zealand.
P MurphyWhanganui District Health Board, New Zealand.
L SicelyWhanganui District Health Board, New Zealand.
S AionoWhanganui District Health Board, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNew Zealand lacks a formal abdominal aortic aneurysm screening programme and owing to its rural nature, many patients have limited access to vascular surgery. Patients with vascular emergencies often have limited treatment options locally, especially if they present perimortem. In our small hospital in Whanganui, with the nearest vascular centre more than 150km away, there are cases of aneurysms diagnosed incidentally on radiology reporting but lost to follow-up.

methodsClinical Portal (CP) is a widely used patient-centred dashboard for viewing health information that is managed by Orion Health. A search strategy utilising the CP common database was devised that aimed to find aneurysms which were not followed up. This search was performed retrospectively for all imaging within a 5-month period.

resultsSome 294 scans were flagged and 53 patients with aneurysms were found. Of these patients, 36 had follow-up by the ordering provider and 17 (32%) were found to have been lost to follow-up.

conclusionsOur pilot study demonstrated high rates of loss to follow-up and a lack of communication of important health information across multiple health disciplines in the region, and represents a potential method for identifying 'lost' aneurysms. For patients in rural communities, this may be critical to preventing future complications from aneurysmal disease.

Indexed as

Aortic Aneurysm, AbdominalHumansInformation SystemsPilot ProjectsRetrospective StudiesVascular Surgical ProceduresAbdominal aortic aneurysmQuality improvementRural populationSurveillance

Identifiers

PMID36239932
PMCPMC10149271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.