Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36239883›Full record

Observational studyTargeted oncology2022

Real-World Activity and Safety of Trifluridine-Tipiracil Plus Bevacizumab Therapy in Patients with Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Gianluca Arrichiello, Alessandra Perrone, Stefania Napolitano, Giulia Martini, Vincenzo De Falco, Pasquale Incoronato, Maria Maddalena Laterza, Gaetano Facchini, Vincenzo Famiglietti, Valeria Nacca and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Targeted oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gianluca ArrichielloDepartment of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Alessandra PerroneDepartment of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Stefania NapolitanoDepartment of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Giulia MartiniDepartment of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Vincenzo De FalcoDepartment of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Pasquale IncoronatoASL Napoli 2 Nord, Via Lupoli 27, Frattamaggiore, 80027, Naples, Italy.
Maria Maddalena LaterzaASL Napoli 2 Nord, Via Lupoli 27, Frattamaggiore, 80027, Naples, Italy.
Gaetano FacchiniASL Napoli 2 Nord, Via Lupoli 27, Frattamaggiore, 80027, Naples, Italy.
Vincenzo FamigliettiDepartment of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Valeria NaccaDepartment of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Fernando ParagliolaDepartment of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Rossella NapolitanoDepartment of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Gabriella SuaratoDepartment of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Antonella NicastroDepartment of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Erika MartinelliDepartment of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Davide CiardielloOncology Unit, Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza Hospital, 71013, San Giovanni Rotondo , Foggia, Italy.
Fortunato CiardielloDepartment of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Teresa TroianiDepartment of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy. teresa.troiani@unicampania.it.
University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITCasa Sollievo della Sofferenza · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe combination of trifluridine-tipiracil and bevacizumab was compared with trifluridine-tipiracil monotherapy in a randomized, open-label, phase II trial, resulting in a statistically significant and clinically relevant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS), with tolerable toxicity in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC); however, evidence supporting the role of this combination in a real-world setting is limited.

objectiveThe aim of our work was to provide further evidence on the activity and safety of this combination in a real-world series of Western mCRC patients refractory or intolerant to previous therapies. PATIENT AND

methodsWe conducted a retrospective, observational study of patients with mCRC refractory or intolerant to standard therapies. Patients were treated with trifluridine-tipiracil and bevacizumab. Previous therapy with fluoropyrimidines, irinotecan, oxaliplatin, bevacizumab, aflibercept, regorafenib, and cetuximab or panitumumab (only RAS wild-type) was allowed, as was previous participation in clinical trials. Clinicopathological characteristics, overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), PFS, and safety data were retrospectively collected and analyzed.

resultsWe recorded 31 patients treated between 1 December 2017 and 30 June 2022. Median age was 69 years (range 38-82 years), 39% were male, 100% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 0-1, tumor location was left-sided in 77% of cases, 54% had synchronous presentation, 35% were RAS mutant, 3% were BRAF mutant, and 71% underwent primary tumor resection; 64% of patients had liver metastases, 55% had lung metastases, and 23% had peritoneal carcinomatosis. The median number of previous treatment lines was 2 (range 0-5), and 84% of patients received at least one previous anti-angiogenic agent. The ORR and DCR were 3% and 71%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 8 months (range 2-39), median PFS was 6 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.1-8.9 months) and median OS was 14 months (95% CI 10.1-17.8 months). Adverse events of any grade were reported in 58% of patients. The most common grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia (19%) and anemia (6%); 35% of patients required either dose delays or dose reductions due to toxicity. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) prophylaxis was administered either on first or subsequent cycles of treatment in 35% of patients. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Sixty percent of the patients who discontinued treatment eventually received one or more lines of subsequent therapy.

conclusionsOur series provides further evidence on the activity and safety of the combination of trifluridine-tipiracil and bevacizumab in a real-world series of Western refractory mCRC patients.

Indexed as

Colonic NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBevacizumabFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPyrrolidinesRetrospective StudiesThymineTrifluridineUracilBevacizumabPyrrolidinesThyminetipiracilTrifluridineUracil

Identifiers

PMID36239883
PMCPMC9684226
OpenAlexW4306168568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.