Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36239872›Full record

Observational studyTechniques in coloproctology2023

Short- and long-term outcomes in ypT2 rectal cancer patients after neoadjuvant therapy and local excision: a multicentre observational study.

Roberto Peltrini, Simone Castiglioni, Nicola Imperatore, Monica Ortenzi, Daniela Rega, Valentina Romeo, Valerio Caracino, Edoardo Liberatore, Massimo Basti, Emanuele Santoro and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Techniques in coloproctology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Roberto PeltriniDepartment of Public Health, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy. roberto.peltrini@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0445-2269
Simone CastiglioniDepartment of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, University G. D'Annunzio Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Nicola ImperatoreGastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, AORN Antonio Cardarelli, Naples, Italy.
Monica OrtenziDepartment of General and Emergency Surgery, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy.
Daniela RegaColorectal Surgical Oncology, Department of Abdominal Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", Naples, Italy.
Valentina RomeoDepartment of Surgery, San Giovanni Addolorata Hospital Complex, Rome, Italy.
Valerio CaracinoGeneral and Emergency Surgery Unit, Santo Spirito Hospital, ASL Pescara, Pescara, Italy.
Edoardo LiberatoreGeneral Surgery Unit, "San Liberatore" Hospital, Atri, ASL Teramo, Teramo, Italy.
Massimo BastiGeneral and Emergency Surgery Unit, Santo Spirito Hospital, ASL Pescara, Pescara, Italy.
Emanuele SantoroDepartment of Surgery, San Giovanni Addolorata Hospital Complex, Rome, Italy.
Umberto BracaleDepartment of Public Health, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Paolo DelrioColorectal Surgical Oncology, Department of Abdominal Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale", Naples, Italy.
Felice MucilliDepartment of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, University G. D'Annunzio Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Mario GuerrieriDepartment of General and Emergency Surgery, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy.
Francesco CorcioneDepartment of Public Health, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Azienda Ospedaliera San Giovanni Addolorata · ITIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" · ITMarche Polytechnic University · ITUniversity of Chieti-Pescara · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · ITFederico II University Hospital · ITOspedale Antonio Cardarelli · ITUniversity of Teramo · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough local excision (LE) after neoadjuvant treatment (NT) has achieved encouraging oncological outcomes in selected patients, radical surgery still remains the rule when unfavorable pathology occurs. However, there is a risk of undertreating patients not eligible for radical surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of patients with pathological incomplete response (ypT2) in a multicentre cohort of patients undergoing LE after NT and to compare them with ypT0-is-1 rectal cancers.

methodsFrom 2010 to 2019, all patients who underwent LE after NT for rectal cancer were identified from five institutional retrospective databases. After excluding 12 patients with ypT3 tumors, patients with ypT2 tumors were compared to patients with ypT0-is-1 tumors). The endpoints of the study were early postoperative and long-term oncological outcomes.

resultsA total of 177 patients (132 males, 45 females, median age 70 [IQR 16] years) underwent LE following NT. There were 46 ypT2 patients (39 males, 7 females, median age 72 [IQR 18.25] years) and 119 ypT0-is-1 patients (83 males, 36 females, median age 69 [IQR 15] years). Patients with pathological incomplete response (ypT2) were frailer than the ypT0-is-1 patients (mean Charlson Comorbidity Index 6.15 ± 2.43 vs. 5.29 ± 1.99; p = 0.02) and there was a significant difference in the type of NT used for the two groups (long- course radiotherapy: 100 (84%) vs. 23 (63%), p = 0.006; short-course radiotherapy: 19 (16%) vs. 17 (37%), p = 0.006). The postoperative rectal bleeding rate (13% vs. 1.7%; p = 0.008), readmission rate (10.9% vs. 0.8%; p = 0.008) and R1 resection rate (8.7% vs. 0; p = 0.008) was significantly higher in the ypT2 group. Recurrence rates were comparable between groups (5% vs. 13%; p = 0.15). Five-year overall survival was 91.3% and 94.9% in the ypT2 and ypT0-is-1 groups, respectively (p = 0.39), while 5-year cancer specific survival was 93.4% in the ypT2 group and 94.9% in the ypT0-is-1 group (p = 0.70). No difference was found in terms of 5-year local recurrence free-survival (p = 0.18) and 5-year distant recurrence free-survival (p = 0.37).

conclusionsPatients with ypT2 tumors after NT and LE have a higher risk of late-onset rectal bleeding and positive resection margins than patients with complete or near complete response. However, long-term recurrence rates and survival seem comparable.

Indexed as

Neoadjuvant TherapyRectal NeoplasmsAgedFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPostoperative HemorrhageRectumRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeChemoradiotherapyLocal excisionOrgan preservationRectal cancerTransanal endoscopic microsurgeryTransanal minimally invasive surgery

Identifiers

PMID36239872
PMCPMC9807481
OpenAlexW4306247753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.