Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36239839›Full record

Trial reportCerebellum (London, England)2023

Suppression of Motor Sequence Learning and Execution Through Anodal Cerebellar Transcranial Electrical Stimulation.

Angela Voegtle, Clara Terlutter, Katharina Nikolai, Amr Farahat, Hermann Hinrichs, Catherine M Sweeney-Reed

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cerebellum (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Angela VoegtleDepartment of Neurology, Neurocybernetics and Rehabilitation, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany. angela.voegtle@med.ovgu.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5715-2767
Clara TerlutterDepartment of Neurology, Neurocybernetics and Rehabilitation, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.
Katharina NikolaiDepartment of Neurology, Neurocybernetics and Rehabilitation, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.
Amr FarahatDepartment of Neurology, Neurocybernetics and Rehabilitation, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.
Hermann HinrichsDepartment of Behavioral Neurology, Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology, Brenneckestr. 6, 39118, Magdeburg, Germany.
Catherine M Sweeney-ReedDepartment of Neurology, Neurocybernetics and Rehabilitation, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany. catherine.sweeney-reed@med.ovgu.de.
Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg · DECenter for Behavioral Brain Sciences · DEErnst Strüngmann Institute for Neuroscience · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SW214/2-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerebellum (CB) and primary motor cortex (M1) have been associated with motor learning, with different putative roles. Modulation of task performance through application of transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS) to brain structures provides causal evidence for their engagement in the task. Studies evaluating and comparing TDCS to these structures have provided conflicting results, however, likely due to varying paradigms and stimulation parameters. Here we applied TDCS to CB and M1 within the same experimental design, to enable direct comparison of their roles in motor sequence learning. We examined the effects of anodal TDCS during motor sequence learning in 60 healthy participants, randomly allocated to CB-TDCS, M1-TDCS, or Sham stimulation groups during a serial reaction time task. Key to the design was an equal number of repeated and random sequences. Reaction times (RTs) to implicitly learned and random sequences were compared between groups using ANOVAs and post hoc t-tests. A speed-accuracy trade-off was excluded by analogous analysis of accuracy scores. An interaction was observed between whether responses were to learned or random sequences and the stimulation group. Post hoc analyses revealed a preferential slowing of RTs to implicitly learned sequences in the group receiving CB-TDCS. Our findings provide evidence that CB function can be modulated through transcranial application of a weak electrical current, that the CB and M1 cortex perform separable functions in the task, and that the CB plays a specific role in motor sequence learning during implicit motor sequence learning.

Indexed as

Motor CortexTranscranial Direct Current StimulationCerebellumHumansLearningReaction TimeCerebellumMotor inhibitionMotor sequence learningPrimary motor cortexSerial reaction time taskTranscranial direct current stimulation

Identifiers

PMID36239839
PMCPMC10657296
OpenAlexW4306168581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.